Author: Lau, Susanna K.P.; Che, Xiao-Yan; Woo, Patrick C.Y.; Wong, Beatrice H.L.; Cheng, Vincent C.C.; Woo, Gibson K.S.; Hung, Ivan F.N.; Poon, Rosana W.S.; Chan, Kwok-Hung; Peiris, J.S. Malik; Yuen, Kwok-Yung
Title: SARS Coronavirus Detection Methods Cord-id: qm3qfvry Document date: 2005_7_25
ID: qm3qfvry
Snippet: Using clinical samples from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome, we showed that the sensitivities of a quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (80% for fecal samples and 25% for urine samples) were higher than those of the polyclonal (50% and 5%) and monoclonal (35% and 8%) antibody-based nucleocapsid antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Document: Using clinical samples from patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome, we showed that the sensitivities of a quantitative reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (80% for fecal samples and 25% for urine samples) were higher than those of the polyclonal (50% and 5%) and monoclonal (35% and 8%) antibody-based nucleocapsid antigen capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date