Author: DÃaz, Desiree A; Anderson, Mindi; Hill, Peggy P; Quelly, Susan B; Clark, Kristen; Lynn, Melissa
Title: Comparison of Clinical Options: High-Fidelity Manikin-Based and Virtual Simulation. Cord-id: k3mqzvzu Document date: 2020_8_3
ID: k3mqzvzu
Snippet: BACKGROUND Minimal evidence compares nursing student outcomes when replacing clinical hours with manikin-based high-fidelity patient simulation (HFPS) or virtual simulation. PURPOSE The study aims were to compare differences in outcomes: (1) between 2 intervention groups (HFPS or virtual simulation) when replacing 25% of pediatric/obstetrics clinical hours and (2) pass/fail for clinical practice between the intervention groups and a face-to-face clinical group (control). METHODS A quasi-experime
Document: BACKGROUND Minimal evidence compares nursing student outcomes when replacing clinical hours with manikin-based high-fidelity patient simulation (HFPS) or virtual simulation. PURPOSE The study aims were to compare differences in outcomes: (1) between 2 intervention groups (HFPS or virtual simulation) when replacing 25% of pediatric/obstetrics clinical hours and (2) pass/fail for clinical practice between the intervention groups and a face-to-face clinical group (control). METHODS A quasi-experimental study was conducted to determine differences in knowledge between intervention groups participating in 6 pediatric/obstetrics simulation scenarios. RESULTS No differences in composite knowledge were found between simulation groups (P = .319). There also was no difference in clinical practice pass/fail among the groups. CONCLUSIONS HFPS and virtual simulation were equally effective in achieving learning goals.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date