Author: Koinig, Karin A.; Arnold, Christoph; Lehmann, Jens; Giesinger, Johannes; Köck, Stefan; Willenbacher, Wolfgang; Weger, Roman; Holzner, Bernhard; Ganswindt, Ute; Wolf, Dominik; Stauder, Reinhard
Title: The cancer patient’s perspective of COVIDâ€19â€induced distress—A crossâ€sectional study and a longitudinal comparison of HRQOL assessed before and during the pandemic Cord-id: s5zbe4ic Document date: 2021_5_10
ID: s5zbe4ic
Snippet: BACKGROUND: To permit timely mitigation of adverse effects on overall clinical outcome, it is essential to understand how the pandemic influences distress and healthâ€related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) pandemic. METHODS: In this crossâ€sectional study, adult cancer patients, without COVIDâ€19 symptoms, completed a 13â€item questionnaire about the pandemic's impacts on distress and everydayâ€life; associations with age, sex, or
Document: BACKGROUND: To permit timely mitigation of adverse effects on overall clinical outcome, it is essential to understand how the pandemic influences distress and healthâ€related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) pandemic. METHODS: In this crossâ€sectional study, adult cancer patients, without COVIDâ€19 symptoms, completed a 13â€item questionnaire about the pandemic's impacts on distress and everydayâ€life; associations with age, sex, or impaired HRQOL were then assessed by binary logistic regressions. In a subsample of patients with HRQOL assessment available from both before and during the pandemic, we evaluated the pandemic's impact on longitudinal changes in HRQOL reported within 6 months before versus during the COVIDâ€19 lockdown using McNemar's test, and thresholds for clinical importance. RESULTS: We consecutively enrolled 240 patients with solid (50%) or hematological (50%) cancers. Median age was 67 years, 46% were females. The majority ranked heeding their health (80%) and keeping their appointment schedule in hospital (78%) as important. Being younger than 60, or aged 60–70 was independently associated with limitations in everyday life (OR = 3.57, p < 0.001; and 2.05, p = 0.038); female individuals and those with restricted emotional functioning were more distressed by the COVIDâ€19 situation (OR = 2.47, p = 0.040; and 3.17, p = 0.019); the latter group was also significantly more concerned about being a patient at risk (OR = 2.21, p = 0.029). Interestingly, in a subsample of patients (n = 47), longitudinal comparisons pre†versus during the pandemic revealed that HRQOL was not substantially affected by the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Particularly younger and female cancer patients, and those with impaired emotional functioning are distressed by COVIDâ€19. During the first COVIDâ€19 lockdown, cancer patients remained predominantly resilient. This analysis highlights the need to mitigate distress situations in vulnerable patients and thereby enhance resilience during pandemics.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- logistic regression and longitudinal comparison: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date