Selected article for: "Independent sample and linear regression"

Author: Wilson, Jason J; McMullan, Ilona; Blackburn, Nicole E; Klempel, Natalie; Yakkundi, Anita; Armstrong, Nicola C; Brolly, Colette; Butler, Laurie T; Barnett, Yvonne; Jacob, Louis; Koyanagi, Ai; Smith, Lee; Tully, Mark A
Title: Changes in dietary fat intake and associations with mental health in a UK public sample during the COVID-19 pandemic
  • Cord-id: eh3oc2j5
  • Document date: 2021_3_1
  • ID: eh3oc2j5
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Consumption of unhealthy foods may have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored how dietary fat intake was impacted in a sample of the UK public who were social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were collected from a UK COVID-19 online survey. Fat intake was measured using the Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education questionnaire. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using Becks’ Anxiety and Depression Inventories, while the short-
    Document: BACKGROUND: Consumption of unhealthy foods may have changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored how dietary fat intake was impacted in a sample of the UK public who were social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Data were collected from a UK COVID-19 online survey. Fat intake was measured using the Dietary Instrument for Nutrition Education questionnaire. Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using Becks’ Anxiety and Depression Inventories, while the short-form Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale assessed mental well-being. Differences between individuals who increased versus decreased fat intake were explored using chi-square or independent sample t-tests. Association between fat intake and mental health was explored using adjusted linear regression models. RESULTS: Eight hundred and eighty-seven adults were included. Approximately, 34% recorded medium-to-high levels of fat consumption during social distancing. Around 48% reported decreased fat intake during social distancing compared to usual levels, while 41.3% documented increased fat intake. Fat intake was not significantly associated (P > 0.05) with any measures of mental health. CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of a sample of UK adults social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic recorded decreased fat intake when compared to levels prior to social distancing. There appeared to be no associations between fat intake and mental health.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • active living and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • activity physical nutrition and lockdown period: 1, 2
    • activity physical nutrition and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • activity physical nutrition and low intake: 1, 2
    • activity physical nutrition and low mental: 1
    • liver cirrhosis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • liver cirrhosis and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • lockdown period and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • lockdown period and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • lockdown period and long term establish: 1
    • lockdown period and low intake: 1, 2
    • lockdown period and low mental: 1, 2
    • lockdown period and low socio economic status: 1
    • lockdown restriction and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • lockdown restriction and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2
    • logistic regression and long term establish: 1, 2
    • logistic regression and low annual income: 1
    • logistic regression and low intake: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • logistic regression and low mental: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24