Author: Ghimire, Sujan; Yaseen, Zaher Mundher; Farooque, Aitazaz A.; Deo, Ravinesh C.; Zhang, Ji; Tao, Xiaohui
                    Title: Streamflow prediction using an integrated methodology based on convolutional neural network and long short-term memory networks  Cord-id: t07o7h7z  Document date: 2021_9_1
                    ID: t07o7h7z
                    
                    Snippet: Streamflow (Q(flow)) prediction is one of the essential steps for the reliable and robust water resources planning and management. It is highly vital for hydropower operation, agricultural planning, and flood control. In this study, the convolution neural network (CNN) and Long-Short-term Memory network (LSTM) are combined to make a new integrated model called CNN-LSTM to predict the hourly Q(flow) (short-term) at Brisbane River and Teewah Creek, Australia. The CNN layers were used to extract th
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: Streamflow (Q(flow)) prediction is one of the essential steps for the reliable and robust water resources planning and management. It is highly vital for hydropower operation, agricultural planning, and flood control. In this study, the convolution neural network (CNN) and Long-Short-term Memory network (LSTM) are combined to make a new integrated model called CNN-LSTM to predict the hourly Q(flow) (short-term) at Brisbane River and Teewah Creek, Australia. The CNN layers were used to extract the features of Q(flow) time-series, while the LSTM networks use these features from CNN for Q(flow) time series prediction. The proposed CNN-LSTM model is benchmarked against the standalone model CNN, LSTM, and Deep Neural Network models and several conventional artificial intelligence (AI) models. Q(flow) prediction is conducted for different time intervals with the length of 1-Week, 2-Weeks, 4-Weeks, and 9-Months, respectively. With the help of different performance metrics and graphical analysis visualization, the experimental results reveal that with small residual error between the actual and predicted Q(flow), the CNN-LSTM model outperforms all the benchmarked conventional AI models as well as ensemble models for all the time intervals. With 84% of Q(flow) prediction error below the range of 0.05 m(3) s(−1), CNN-LSTM demonstrates a better performance compared to 80% and 66% for LSTM and DNN, respectively. In summary, the results reveal that the proposed CNN-LSTM model based on the novel framework yields more accurate predictions. Thus, CNN-LSTM has significant practical value in Q(flow) prediction.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents- absolute deviation and mae absolute error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- absolute deviation and magnetic resonance: 1, 2
- absolute difference and machine learning: 1, 2
- absolute difference and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absolute difference and mae absolute error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4
- absolute difference and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3
- absolute error and activation function: 1, 2
- absolute error and long short term memory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28
- absolute error and lstm model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
- absolute error and lstm network: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- absolute error and lstm prediction: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- absolute error and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58
- absolute error and machine learning model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- absolute error and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- absolute error and mae absolute error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- absolute error and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4
 
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date