Author: Ghimire, Sujan; Yaseen, Zaher Mundher; Farooque, Aitazaz A.; Deo, Ravinesh C.; Zhang, Ji; Tao, Xiaohui
Title: Streamflow prediction using an integrated methodology based on convolutional neural network and long short-term memory networks Cord-id: t07o7h7z Document date: 2021_9_1
ID: t07o7h7z
Snippet: Streamflow (Q(flow)) prediction is one of the essential steps for the reliable and robust water resources planning and management. It is highly vital for hydropower operation, agricultural planning, and flood control. In this study, the convolution neural network (CNN) and Long-Short-term Memory network (LSTM) are combined to make a new integrated model called CNN-LSTM to predict the hourly Q(flow) (short-term) at Brisbane River and Teewah Creek, Australia. The CNN layers were used to extract th
Document: Streamflow (Q(flow)) prediction is one of the essential steps for the reliable and robust water resources planning and management. It is highly vital for hydropower operation, agricultural planning, and flood control. In this study, the convolution neural network (CNN) and Long-Short-term Memory network (LSTM) are combined to make a new integrated model called CNN-LSTM to predict the hourly Q(flow) (short-term) at Brisbane River and Teewah Creek, Australia. The CNN layers were used to extract the features of Q(flow) time-series, while the LSTM networks use these features from CNN for Q(flow) time series prediction. The proposed CNN-LSTM model is benchmarked against the standalone model CNN, LSTM, and Deep Neural Network models and several conventional artificial intelligence (AI) models. Q(flow) prediction is conducted for different time intervals with the length of 1-Week, 2-Weeks, 4-Weeks, and 9-Months, respectively. With the help of different performance metrics and graphical analysis visualization, the experimental results reveal that with small residual error between the actual and predicted Q(flow), the CNN-LSTM model outperforms all the benchmarked conventional AI models as well as ensemble models for all the time intervals. With 84% of Q(flow) prediction error below the range of 0.05 m(3) s(−1), CNN-LSTM demonstrates a better performance compared to 80% and 66% for LSTM and DNN, respectively. In summary, the results reveal that the proposed CNN-LSTM model based on the novel framework yields more accurate predictions. Thus, CNN-LSTM has significant practical value in Q(flow) prediction.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- lstm network and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- lstm network and machine learning model: 1
- lstm network and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lstm network and mae absolute error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lstm network and magnetic resonance: 1, 2
- lstm prediction and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lstm prediction and machine learning model: 1, 2
- lstm prediction and mae absolute error: 1
- lstm prediction and mae absolute error mean: 1
- lstm prediction and magnetic resonance: 1
- lstm recurrent layer and machine learning: 1
- machine learning and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- machine learning and mae absolute error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- machine learning and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34
- machine learning model and mae absolute error: 1, 2, 3, 4
- machine learning model and mae absolute error mean: 1, 2, 3, 4
- machine learning model and magnetic resonance: 1, 2
- mae absolute error and magnetic resonance: 1, 2, 3
- mae absolute error mean and magnetic resonance: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date