Author: Fusco, Roberta; Grassi, Roberta; Granata, Vincenza; Setola, Sergio Venanzio; Grassi, Francesca; Cozzi, Diletta; Pecori, Biagio; Izzo, Francesco; Petrillo, Antonella
Title: Artificial Intelligence and COVID-19 Using Chest CT Scan and Chest X-ray Images: Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Diagnosis and Treatment Cord-id: cmyzotg1 Document date: 2021_9_30
ID: cmyzotg1
Snippet: Objective: To report an overview and update on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and COVID-19 using chest Computed Tomography (CT) scan and chest X-ray images (CXR). Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Diagnosis and Treatment were identified. Methods: Several electronic datasets were analyzed. The search covered the years from January 2019 to June 2021. The inclusion criteria were studied evaluating the use of AI methods in COVID-19 disease reporting performance results in terms of accu
Document: Objective: To report an overview and update on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and COVID-19 using chest Computed Tomography (CT) scan and chest X-ray images (CXR). Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Diagnosis and Treatment were identified. Methods: Several electronic datasets were analyzed. The search covered the years from January 2019 to June 2021. The inclusion criteria were studied evaluating the use of AI methods in COVID-19 disease reporting performance results in terms of accuracy or precision or area under Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC). Results: Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria: 13 papers were based on AI in CXR and 10 based on AI in CT. The summarized mean value of the accuracy and precision of CXR in COVID-19 disease were 93.7% ± 10.0% of standard deviation (range 68.4–99.9%) and 95.7% ± 7.1% of standard deviation (range 83.0–100.0%), respectively. The summarized mean value of the accuracy and specificity of CT in COVID-19 disease were 89.1% ± 7.3% of standard deviation (range 78.0–99.9%) and 94.5 ± 6.4% of standard deviation (range 86.0–100.0%), respectively. No statistically significant difference in summarized accuracy mean value between CXR and CT was observed using the Chi square test (p value > 0.05). Conclusions: Summarized accuracy of the selected papers is high but there was an important variability; however, less in CT studies compared to CXR studies. Nonetheless, AI approaches could be used in the identification of disease clusters, monitoring of cases, prediction of the future outbreaks, mortality risk, COVID-19 diagnosis, and disease management.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abstract title and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
- abstract title and lung breast: 1
- abstract title and lung breast cancer: 1
- accuracy attain and lung lesion: 1
- accuracy auc and lung breast: 1
- accuracy auc and lung lesion: 1, 2
- accuracy rate and lung lesion: 1
- accuracy specificity and acid amplification: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- accuracy specificity and acid amplification test: 1
- accuracy specificity and low quality: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy specificity and lung breast: 1
- accuracy specificity and lung lesion: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy specificity sensitivity and acid amplification: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- accuracy specificity sensitivity and acid amplification test: 1
- accuracy specificity sensitivity and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accuracy specificity sensitivity excellent diagnostic performance and low quality: 1
- accurate rapid and acid amplification: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accurate rapid and low quality: 1, 2, 3
- accurate rapid and lung breast: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date