Selected article for: "international license and selection bias"
Author: Eric Anthony Coomes; Hourmazd Haghbayan
Title: Interleukin-6 in COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
  • Document date: 2020_4_3
    • ID: nadcsiii_43
    Snippet: Most studies included in this review were rated at moderate or high risk of bias, reflecting generally low methodological quality. This was primarily driven by a lack of control for confounding, inconsistencies or unclarity of the context in which IL-6 measurements were performed, and potential for selection bias due to lack of consecutive patient enrolment. Lastly, we identified only a single, non-randomized, single-arm study investigating the e.....
    Document: Most studies included in this review were rated at moderate or high risk of bias, reflecting generally low methodological quality. This was primarily driven by a lack of control for confounding, inconsistencies or unclarity of the context in which IL-6 measurements were performed, and potential for selection bias due to lack of consecutive patient enrolment. Lastly, we identified only a single, non-randomized, single-arm study investigating the effect of tocilizumab treatment in patients with COVID-19; while promising, this provides only low-level . CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license It is made available under a author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • bias high moderate risk and low level: 1
    • bias high moderate risk and methodological quality: 1, 2, 3
    • cc NC ND International license and International license: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • cc NC ND International license and low level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • cc NC ND International license and methodological quality: 1, 2
    • consecutive patient enrolment and patient enrolment: 1
    • consecutive patient enrolment lack and patient enrolment: 1
    • generally low methodological quality and low level: 1
    • generally low methodological quality and methodological quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • high moderate risk and International license: 1
    • high moderate risk and low level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • high moderate risk and methodological quality: 1, 2, 3
    • International license and low level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • International license and methodological quality: 1, 2
    • low level and methodological quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11