Selected article for: "control group and low infection"

Author: Rovida, Francesca; Cassaniti, Irene; Percivalle, Elena; Sarasini, Antonella; Paolucci, Stefania; Klersy, Catherine; Cutti, Sara; Novelli, Viola; Marena, Carlo; Luzzaro, Francesco; De Vito, Giovanni; Schiavo, Roberta; Cascio, Giuliana Lo; Lilleri, Daniele; Baldanti, Fausto
Title: Incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in health care workers from Northern Italy based on antibody status: immune protection from secondary infection- A retrospective observational case-control study.
  • Cord-id: pdog8wqh
  • Document date: 2021_7_7
  • ID: pdog8wqh
    Snippet: OBJECTIVE: The protection form SARS-CoV-2 infection induced by SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 and anti-S2 IgG antibody positivity resulting from natural infection was evaluated. METHODS: The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection (as determined by virus RNA detection) was evaluated in a group of 1,460 seropositive and a control groups of 8,150 seronegative healthcare workers in three Centres of Northern Italy in the period June-November 2020. Neutralizing serum titers were analysed in seropositive subjects with
    Document: OBJECTIVE: The protection form SARS-CoV-2 infection induced by SARS-CoV-2 anti-S1 and anti-S2 IgG antibody positivity resulting from natural infection was evaluated. METHODS: The frequency of SARS-CoV-2 infection (as determined by virus RNA detection) was evaluated in a group of 1,460 seropositive and a control groups of 8,150 seronegative healthcare workers in three Centres of Northern Italy in the period June-November 2020. Neutralizing serum titers were analysed in seropositive subjects with or without secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: During the 6-month survey, 1.78% seropositive subjects developed secondary SARS-CoV-2 infection while 6.63% seronegative controls developed primary infection (odds ratio: 0.26; 95% confidence interval: 0.17-0.38). Secondary infection was associated with low or absent serum neutralizing titer (p<0.01) and was mildly symptomatic in 45.8% cases vs 71.4% symptomatic primary infections (odds ratio: 0.34; 95% confidence interval: 0.16-0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Immunity from natural infection appears protective from secondary infection; therefore, vaccination of seronegative subjects might be prioritized.

    Search related documents: