Selected article for: "cross sectional study and different risk"

Author: Wattal, Chand; Oberoi, Jaswinder Kaur; Goel, Neeraj; Datta, Sanghamitra; Raveendran, Reena; Rao, Brijendra Kumar; Kumar, Reena
Title: A cross-sectional study of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among asymptomatic healthcare workers in a tertiary healthcare centre: Assessing the impact of PPE guidelines
  • Cord-id: qqaqbyzc
  • Document date: 2021_10_20
  • ID: qqaqbyzc
    Snippet: PURPOSE: The present study estimates the seroprevalence of SARS-COV-2 among asymptomatic HCWs and assess the impact of various categories of PPE. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of asymptomatic HCW using different levels of PPE as per their risk profile was undertaken between 18th and 24th September 2020. Participant demographics and other relevant details including the levels of PPE used were recorded using a customized questionnaire. IgG antibodies against SARS-COV-2 were detected by chemilum
    Document: PURPOSE: The present study estimates the seroprevalence of SARS-COV-2 among asymptomatic HCWs and assess the impact of various categories of PPE. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of asymptomatic HCW using different levels of PPE as per their risk profile was undertaken between 18th and 24th September 2020. Participant demographics and other relevant details including the levels of PPE used were recorded using a customized questionnaire. IgG antibodies against SARS-COV-2 were detected by chemiluminescence method & used as a surrogate marker for incomplete protection. RESULTS: Out of 1033 HCWs tested, overall SARS-COV-2 sero-prevalence was 25.8%. Univariate and multivariate analysis both demonstrated that ancillary workers including security staff (OR 5.589, P ​< ​0.001) and sanitary workers (OR 3.946, P ​< ​0.001) were at significantly higher risk of seropositivity irrespective of the PPE used as per guidelines, whereas doctors were at significantly lower risk of seropositivity (OR 0.307, P ​= ​0.005). Staff working in office areas was associated with reduced risk of seropositivity (OR 0.21, P ​= ​0.045). CONCLUSIONS: We document high seroprevalence of SARS-COV-2 antibodies in asymptomatic HCWs. Doctors who are at the highest risk had the lowest seropositivity and seroprevalence among office staff having a risk level comparable to the general community was lower than that reported in general population, supporting the efficacy of PPE practices as per guidelines in these groups. In contrast, much higher rates of seropositivity were seen among ancillary workers despite the availability of adequate PPE. Active screening, proper PPE use as per guidelines, and regular infection control trainings including Covid appropriate behaviour are therefore essential to contain COVID-19 spread among HCW & preventing them to transfer infection to the patients.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acid testing and adequate ppe: 1
    • acid testing and local epidemiology: 1
    • acute infection and adequate ppe: 1, 2, 3
    • acute infection and adherence low rate: 1
    • acute infection and administrative staff: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute infection and local epidemiology: 1
    • acute infection and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute infection and low intermediate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acute infection and low intermediate risk: 1
    • acute infection and low seropositivity: 1
    • acute viral illness and low intermediate: 1
    • adequate ppe and administrative staff: 1, 2
    • adequate ppe and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3
    • adequate ppe and low intermediate: 1
    • adequate ppe and low intermediate risk: 1
    • adherence low rate and low seropositivity: 1
    • administrative staff and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3
    • logistic regression model and low intermediate risk: 1, 2