Author: Wei, F.; Yu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Wang, R.; Guo, X.; Jin, H.; Guo, S.; Ouyang, Y.; Shi, Y.; Jin, R.; Chen, D.
Title: Laboratory validation of an RNA/DNA hybrid tagmentation based mNGS workflow on SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory RNA viruses detection Cord-id: cw5pqroz Document date: 2020_5_14
ID: cw5pqroz
Snippet: Background: Acute respiratory infection caused by RNA viruses is still one of the main diseases all over the world such as SARS CoV 2 and Influenza A virus. mNGS was a powerful tool for ethological diagnosis. But there were some challenges during mNGS implementation in clinical settings such as time consuming manipulation and lack of comprehensive analytical validation. Methods: We set up CATCH that was a mNGS method based on RNA and DNA hybrid tagmentation via Tn5 transposon. Seven respiratory
Document: Background: Acute respiratory infection caused by RNA viruses is still one of the main diseases all over the world such as SARS CoV 2 and Influenza A virus. mNGS was a powerful tool for ethological diagnosis. But there were some challenges during mNGS implementation in clinical settings such as time consuming manipulation and lack of comprehensive analytical validation. Methods: We set up CATCH that was a mNGS method based on RNA and DNA hybrid tagmentation via Tn5 transposon. Seven respiratory RNA viruses and three subtypes of Influenza A virus had been used to test capabilities of CATCH on detection and quantification. Analytical performance of SARS CoV 2 and Influenza A virus had been determined with reference standards. We compared accuracy of CATCH with quantitative real time PCR by using clinical 98 samples from 64 COVID19 patients. Results: We minimized the library preparation process to 3 hours and handling time to 35 minutes. Duplicate filtered RPM of 7 respiratory viruses and 3 Influenza A virus subtypes were highly correlated with viral concentration. LOD of SARS CoV 2 was 39.2 copies/test and of Influenza A virus was 278.1 copies/mL. Comparing with quantitative real time PCR, the overall accuracy of CATCH was 91.4%. Sensitivity was 84.5% and specificity was 100%. Meanwhile, there were significant difference of microbial profile in oropharyngeal swabs among critical, moderate patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: Although further optimization is needed before CATCH can be rolled out as a routine diagnostic test, we highlight the potential impact of it advancing molecular diagnostics for respiratory pathogens.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accuracy sensitivity and lod detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- accuracy sensitivity and low concentration: 1, 2, 3
- accuracy sensitivity and low quality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- acute respiratory tract infection and low concentration: 1, 2, 3
- lod detection and low concentration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- lod detection low limit and low concentration: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date