Author: Shaffer, Justin P; Marotz, Clarisse; Belda-Ferre, Pedro; Martino, Cameron; Wandro, Stephen; Estaki, Mehrbod; Salido, Rodolfo A; Carpenter, Carolina S; Zaramela, Livia S; Minich, Jeremiah J; Bryant, MacKenzie; Sanders, Karenina; Fraraccio, Serena; Ackermann, Gail; Humphrey, Gregory; Swafford, Austin D; Miller-Montgomery, Sandrine; Knight, Rob
Title: A comparison of DNA/RNA extraction protocols for high-throughput sequencing of microbial communities Cord-id: d9ez5c63 Document date: 2021_1_29
ID: d9ez5c63
Snippet: One goal of microbial ecology researchers is to capture the maximum amount of information from all organisms in a sample. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2, has highlighted a gap in traditional DNA-based protocols, including the high-throughput methods the authors previously established as field standards. To enable simultaneous SARS-CoV-2 and microbial community profiling, the authors compared the relative performance of two total nucleic acid extraction protocols
Document: One goal of microbial ecology researchers is to capture the maximum amount of information from all organisms in a sample. The recent COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the RNA virus SARS-CoV-2, has highlighted a gap in traditional DNA-based protocols, including the high-throughput methods the authors previously established as field standards. To enable simultaneous SARS-CoV-2 and microbial community profiling, the authors compared the relative performance of two total nucleic acid extraction protocols with the authors' previously benchmarked protocol. The authors included a diverse panel of environmental and host-associated sample types, including body sites commonly swabbed for COVID-19 testing. Here the authors present results comparing the cost, processing time, DNA and RNA yield, microbial community composition, limit of detection and well-to-well contamination between these protocols.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date