Author: Vreeland, Timothy J.; Clifton, Guy T.; Hale, Diane F.; Chick, Robert C.; Hickerson, Annelies T.; Cindass, Jessica L.; Adams, Alexandra M.; Bohan, Phillip M. Kemp; Andtbacka, Robert H. I.; Berger, Adam C.; Jakub, James W.; Sussman, Jeffrey J.; Terando, Alicia M.; Wagner, Thomas; Peoples, George E.; Faries, Mark B.
Title: A Phase IIb Randomized Controlled Trial of the TLPLDC Vaccine as Adjuvant Therapy After Surgical Resection of Stage III/IV Melanoma: A Primary Analysis Cord-id: rijyofef Document date: 2021_2_27
ID: rijyofef
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Melanoma therapy has changed dramatically over the last decade with improvements in immunotherapy, yet many patients do not respond to current therapies. This novel vaccine strategy may prime a patient’s immune system against their tumor and work synergistically with immunotherapy against advanced-stage melanoma. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine admini
Document: BACKGROUND: Melanoma therapy has changed dramatically over the last decade with improvements in immunotherapy, yet many patients do not respond to current therapies. This novel vaccine strategy may prime a patient’s immune system against their tumor and work synergistically with immunotherapy against advanced-stage melanoma. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase IIb trial of the tumor lysate, particle-loaded, dendritic cell (TLPLDC) vaccine administered to prevent recurrence in patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma. Patients were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to the TLPLDC vaccine or placebo (empty yeast cell wall particles and autologous dendritic cells). Both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per treatment (PT) analyses were predefined, with PT analysis including patients who remained disease-free through the primary vaccine/placebo series (6 months). RESULTS: A total of 144 patients were randomized (103 vaccine, 41 control). Therapy was well-tolerated with similar toxicity between treatment arms; one patient in each group experienced related serious adverse events. While disease-free survival (DFS) was not different between groups in ITT analysis, in PT analysis the vaccine group showed improved 24-month DFS (62.9% vs. 34.8%, p = 0.041). CONCLUSIONS: This phase IIb trial of TLPLDC vaccine administered to patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma shows TLPLDC is well-tolerated and improves DFS in patients who complete the primary vaccine series. This suggests patients who do not recur early benefit from TLPLDC in preventing future recurrence from melanoma. A phase III trial of TLPLDC + checkpoint inhibitor versus checkpoint inhibitor alone in patients with advanced, surgically resected melanoma is under development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02301611. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at (10.1245/s10434-021-09709-1).
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute difference and adjuvant therapy: 1
- absolute difference and adjuvant trial: 1
- acceptable consider and adjuvant therapy: 1
- additional patient and adjuvant therapy: 1
- additional therapy and adjuvant therapy: 1, 2, 3, 4
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date