Selected article for: "growth model and model parameter"

Author: Shi Zhao; Salihu S. Musa; Hao Fu; Daihai He; Jing Qin
Title: Large-scale Lassa fever outbreaks in Nigeria: quantifying the association between disease reproduction number and local rainfall
  • Document date: 2019_4_8
  • ID: 6l8r09cd_7
    Snippet: We fit all models to the weekly reported LF cases in different regions evaluate the fitting performance by the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We adopt the standard nonlinear least squares (NLS) approach for model fitting and parameter estimation, following [16, 18] . A pvalue < 0.05 is regarded as statistically significant, and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are estimated for all unknown parameters. The models are selected by comparing t.....
    Document: We fit all models to the weekly reported LF cases in different regions evaluate the fitting performance by the Akaike information criterion (AIC). We adopt the standard nonlinear least squares (NLS) approach for model fitting and parameter estimation, following [16, 18] . A pvalue < 0.05 is regarded as statistically significant, and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are estimated for all unknown parameters. The models are selected by comparing the AIC to that of the baseline model. Only the models with an AIC lower than the AIC of the baseline model are considered for further analysis. Since the epidemic curves of an infectious disease commonly exhibit autocorrelations [19], we use autoregression (AR) models with a degree of 2, i.e., AR(2), as the baseline models for growth model selection. We also adopt the coefficient of determination (R-squared) and the coefficient of partial determination (partial R-squared) to evaluate goodness-of-fit and fitting improvement, respectively. For partial Rsquared, the AR(2) model is treated as the baseline model.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • AIC Akaike information criterion and confidence interval: 1
    • AIC Akaike information criterion and fit goodness: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • AIC Akaike information criterion and growth model: 1
    • AIC Akaike information criterion and infectious disease: 1
    • AIC Akaike information criterion and information criterion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43
    • AIC Akaike information criterion and model fit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • AIC compare and Akaike information criterion: 1
    • AIC compare and information criterion: 1
    • Akaike information criterion and confidence interval: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • Akaike information criterion and epidemic curve: 1, 2
    • Akaike information criterion and fit goodness: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • Akaike information criterion and growth model: 1, 2, 3
    • Akaike information criterion and growth model selection: 1
    • Akaike information criterion and infectious disease: 1, 2
    • Akaike information criterion and information criterion: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74
    • Akaike information criterion and model fit: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13