Selected article for: "clinical outcome and effective model"

Author: Li, Daowei; Zhang, Qiang; Tan, Yue; Feng, Xinghuo; Yue, Yuanyi; Bai, Yuhan; Li, Jimeng; Li, Jiahang; Xu, Youjun; Chen, Shiyu; Xiao, Si-Yu; Sun, Muyan; Li, Xiaona; Zhu, Fang
Title: Prediction of COVID-19 Severity Using Chest Computed Tomography and Laboratory Measurements: Evaluation Using a Machine Learning Approach
  • Cord-id: ofx3y4fj
  • Document date: 2020_11_17
  • ID: ofx3y4fj
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Most of the mortality resulting from COVID-19 has been associated with severe disease. Effective treatment of severe cases remains a challenge due to the lack of early detection of the infection. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop an effective prediction model for COVID-19 severity by combining radiological outcome with clinical biochemical indexes. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with COVID-19 (10 severe, 36 nonsevere) were examined. To build the prediction model, a set of 27 se
    Document: BACKGROUND: Most of the mortality resulting from COVID-19 has been associated with severe disease. Effective treatment of severe cases remains a challenge due to the lack of early detection of the infection. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop an effective prediction model for COVID-19 severity by combining radiological outcome with clinical biochemical indexes. METHODS: A total of 46 patients with COVID-19 (10 severe, 36 nonsevere) were examined. To build the prediction model, a set of 27 severe and 151 nonsevere clinical laboratory records and computerized tomography (CT) records were collected from these patients. We managed to extract specific features from the patients’ CT images by using a recently published convolutional neural network. We also trained a machine learning model combining these features with clinical laboratory results. RESULTS: We present a prediction model combining patients’ radiological outcomes with their clinical biochemical indexes to identify severe COVID-19 cases. The prediction model yielded a cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) score of 0.93 and an F(1) score of 0.89, which showed a 6% and 15% improvement, respectively, compared to the models based on laboratory test features only. In addition, we developed a statistical model for forecasting COVID-19 severity based on the results of patients’ laboratory tests performed before they were classified as severe cases; this model yielded an AUROC score of 0.81. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report predicting the clinical progression of COVID-19, as well as forecasting severity, based on a combined analysis using laboratory tests and CT images.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acid detection and lymphocyte ldh: 1
    • acid detection and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • acid detection and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2
    • acid detection and lymphocyte percentage: 1
    • acid detection and machine learning: 1, 2, 3
    • acid detection and machine learning model: 1
    • acid detection kit and lymphocyte count: 1
    • acid detection kit and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1
    • acid extraction and machine learning: 1
    • acid extraction and machine learning model: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lung volume: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lymphocyte ldh: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lymphocyte neutrophil: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lymphocyte neutrophil ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lymphocyte percentage: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and machine learning model: 1, 2
    • acute renal failure and lung volume: 1