Author: Caulkins, H; Rand, K; Harris, N; Beal, S
                    Title: Nonconcordance of E, N, and RdRp Genes in SARS-Coronavirus-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Among Patients Older than 60 Years  Cord-id: gw6cna9g  Document date: 2020_10_28
                    ID: gw6cna9g
                    
                    Snippet: INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA authorized emergency use of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) testing. Accurate and rapid testing identifies infected persons, especially among at-risk populations. In our institution, the InGenius platform detects three gene targets of SARS-Coronavirus-2: envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Nonconcordance of these components present accuracy or precision errors or may correspond to varying expressi
                    
                    
                    
                     
                    
                    
                    
                    
                        
                            
                                Document: INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA authorized emergency use of nucleic acid amplification (NAA) testing. Accurate and rapid testing identifies infected persons, especially among at-risk populations. In our institution, the InGenius platform detects three gene targets of SARS-Coronavirus-2: envelope (E), nucleocapsid (N), and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). Nonconcordance of these components present accuracy or precision errors or may correspond to varying expression of viral genes with disease progression. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the result components from 93 nasopharyngeal swabs from 50 patients older than 60 years and positive for SARS-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). The symptom onset date was determined by chart review. RESULTS: We found a significant 26% nonconcordance rate, with a predominant pattern demonstrating positive N with negative RdRp and E (χ2 = 27.25, P < 0.0005). This nonconcordant pattern was more prevalent at longer symptom durations. In 7 patients with serial testing, the transition from concordant to nonconcordant results occurred 12 days (95% CI 3.5 – 20.3 days) after symptom onset. CONCLUSION: This may be caused by several mechanisms. Possibilities include decreased expression of E and RdRp over time, inhibition of expression by treatments or host immune response, or lower viral titers by clearance or migration to the lower respiratory tract. Presence of a different viral strain or systematic processing errors are less likely causes of nonconcordance. Future directions of study would determine whether a similar decline in RdRp and E detection is seen in tracheal samples or if this correlates with changes in symptom severity.
 
  Search related documents: 
                                
                                Co phrase  search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date