Selected article for: "broad spectrum and high dose"

Author: Papiris, Spyros A; Kagouridis, Konstantinos; Kolilekas, Likurgos; Papaioannou, Andriana I; Roussou, Aneza; Triantafillidou, Christina; Baou, Katerina; Malagari, Katerina; Argentos, Stylianos; Kotanidou, Anastasia; Karakatsani, Anna; Manali, Effrosyni D
Title: Survival in Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis acute exacerbations: the non-steroid approach
  • Cord-id: bn7h0kcw
  • Document date: 2015_12_14
  • ID: bn7h0kcw
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis acute exacerbation (IPF-AE) constitutes IPF’s most devastating event, representing the unexpected superimposition of diffuse alveolar damage of unknown etiology. Guidelines recommend high-dose steroids treatment despite unproven benefit. We hypothesized that previous immunosuppression and the administration of high-dose steroids adversely affect IPF-AE outcome. METHODS: We studied all consecutive patients hospitalized in our department for IPF deterior
    Document: BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis acute exacerbation (IPF-AE) constitutes IPF’s most devastating event, representing the unexpected superimposition of diffuse alveolar damage of unknown etiology. Guidelines recommend high-dose steroids treatment despite unproven benefit. We hypothesized that previous immunosuppression and the administration of high-dose steroids adversely affect IPF-AE outcome. METHODS: We studied all consecutive patients hospitalized in our department for IPF deterioration from 2007 to June 2013. Our protocol consisted of immediate cessation of immunosuppression (if any), best supportive care, broad-spectrum antimicrobials and thorough evaluation to detect reversible causes of deterioration. Patients were followed-up for survival; post-discharge none received immunosuppression. RESULTS: Twenty-four out of 85 admissions (28 %) fulfilled IPF-AE criteria. IPF-AE were analyzed both as unique events and as unique patients. As unique events 50 % survived; 3 out of 12 (25 %) in the group previously treated with immunosuppression whereas nine out of 12 (75 %) in the group not receiving immunosuppression (p = 0.041). As unique patients 35.3 % survived; 3 out of 6 (50 %) in the never treated group whereas three out of 11 (27.3 %) in the group receiving immunosuppression (p = 0.685). The history of immunosuppression significantly and adversely influenced survival (p = 0.035). Survival was greater in the never treated group compared to the immunosuppressed patients (p = 0.022). Post-discharge, our IPF-AE survivors had an 83 % 1-year survival. CONCLUSIONS: By applying the above mentioned protocol half of our patients survived. The history of immunosuppression before IPF-AE adversely influences survival. Avoiding steroids in IPF patients may favor the natural history of the disease even at the moment of its most devastating event.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • academic center and acute exacerbation: 1
    • academic center and additional treatment: 1, 2
    • academic center and admission steroid: 1
    • academic center and long lasting: 1
    • accelerated phase and long lasting: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and additional treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and long lasting: 1, 2, 3
    • acute exacerbation and additional treatment: 1
    • additional treatment and long lasting: 1, 2, 3