Selected article for: "enlargement sign and vascular enlargement sign"

Author: Ciccarese, Federica; Coppola, Francesca; Spinelli, Daniele; Galletta, Giovanni Luca; Lucidi, Vincenzo; Paccapelo, Alexandro; De Benedittis, Caterina; Balacchi, Caterina; Golfieri, Rita
Title: Diagnostic Accuracy of North America Expert Consensus Statement on Reporting CT Findings in Patients with Suspected COVID-19 Infection: An Italian Single Center Experience
  • Cord-id: ttf9zxsi
  • Document date: 2020_7_23
  • ID: ttf9zxsi
    Snippet: PURPOSE: In suspected COVID-19, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is the reference standard but affected by long reporting time (6-48 hours); the aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the four standardized categories for CT reporting proposed by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) to support a faster triage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 569 HRCT performed for suspected COVID-19 from February 27 to March 27, 2020 (peak of infection in
    Document: PURPOSE: In suspected COVID-19, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) is the reference standard but affected by long reporting time (6-48 hours); the aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the four standardized categories for CT reporting proposed by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) to support a faster triage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 569 HRCT performed for suspected COVID-19 from February 27 to March 27, 2020 (peak of infection in Italy). Imaging pattern was classified according to RSNA statement in “typical”, “indeterminate”, “atypical” and “negative” and compared to RT-PCR, available in 460 patients. Inter-observer variability in reporting between a senior and a junior radiologist was evaluated. Utility of vascular enlargement sign in indeterminate cases, was also assessed. RESULTS: Diagnosis of COVID-19 was made in 211/460 patients (45.9%). “Typical” pattern (n=172) showed a sensitivity of 71.6%, a specificity of 91.6% and a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 87.8% for COVID-19. “Atypical” (n=67) and “negative” (n=123) pattern demonstrated PPV of 89.6% and 86.2% for non COVID-19. “Indeterminate” (n=98) was non-specific, but vascular enlargement was most frequently found in patients with COVID-19 (86.1%- p<0.001). Inter-observer agreement was good for “typical” and “negative” pattern, fair for “indeterminate” and “atypical” (k=0.5, p=0.002). CONCLUSION: In an epidemic setting, application of the four categories proposed by RSNA provides a standardized diagnostic hypothesis, strongly linked to the RT-PCR results for “typical”, “atypical” and “negative” pattern. In “indeterminate” pattern, the analysis of vascular enlargement sign could facilitate the interpretation of imaging features.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acute respiratory and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and low specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory and lung abnormality: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acute respiratory and lung infiltrate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • acute respiratory and lung ultrasonography: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and low specificity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung abnormality: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung infiltrate: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and lung ultrasonography: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • admission ct lung abnormality extent and lung abnormality: 1
    • low sensitivity and lung ultrasonography: 1