Author: van den Berg, Polly; Schechter-Perkins, Elissa M; Jack, Rebecca S; Epshtein, Isabella; Nelson, Richard; Oster, Emily; Branch-Elliman, Westyn
Title: Effectiveness of three versus six feet of physical distancing for controlling spread of COVID-19 among primary and secondary students and staff: A retrospective, state-wide cohort study Cord-id: em2uatlm Document date: 2021_3_10
ID: em2uatlm
Snippet: BACKGROUND: National and international guidelines differ about the optimal physical distancing between students for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission; studies directly comparing the impact of ≥3 versus ≥6 feet of physical distancing policies in school settings are lacking. Thus, our objective was to compare incident cases of SARS-CoV-2 in students and staff in Massachusetts public schools among districts with different physical distancing requirements. State guidance mandates masking for
Document: BACKGROUND: National and international guidelines differ about the optimal physical distancing between students for prevention of SARS-CoV-2 transmission; studies directly comparing the impact of ≥3 versus ≥6 feet of physical distancing policies in school settings are lacking. Thus, our objective was to compare incident cases of SARS-CoV-2 in students and staff in Massachusetts public schools among districts with different physical distancing requirements. State guidance mandates masking for all school staff and for students in grades 2 and higher; the majority of districts required universal masking. METHODS: Community incidence rates of SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 cases among students in grades K-12 and staff participating in-person learning, and district infection control plans were linked. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) for students and staff members in districts with ≥3 versus ≥6 feet of physical distancing were estimated using log-binomial regression; models adjusted for community incidence are also reported. RESULTS: Among 251 eligible school districts, 537,336 students and 99,390 staff attended in-person instruction during the 16-week study period, representing 6,400,175 student learning weeks and 1,342,574 staff learning weeks. Student case rates were similar in the 242 districts with ≥3 feet versus ≥6 feet of physical distancing between students (IRR, 0.891, 95% CI, 0.594-1.335); results were similar after adjusting for community incidence (adjusted IRR, 0.904, 95% CI, 0.616-1.325). Cases among school staff in districts with ≥3 feet versus ≥6 feet of physical distancing were also similar (IRR, 1.015, 95% CI, 0.754-1.365). CONCLUSIONS: Lower physical distancing policies can be adopted in school settings with masking mandates without negatively impacting student or staff safety.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- academic year and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- accuracy ensure and acute respiratory: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- accuracy ensure and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- active surveillance program and acute respiratory: 1
- acute respiratory and adjust model: 1, 2
- acute respiratory and adjusted unadjusted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- acute respiratory syndrome and adjusted unadjusted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date