Author: Kueper, J. K.; Terry, A. L.; Bahniwal, R.; Meredith, L.; Beleno, R.; Brown, J. B.; Dang, J.; Leger, D.; McKay, S.; Ryan, B. L.; Zwarenstein, M.; Lizotte, D. J.
Title: Connecting Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Challenges: Findings from a Multi-Stakeholder Collaborative Consultation Cord-id: t2ecffe1 Document date: 2021_9_26
ID: t2ecffe1
Snippet: Despite widespread advancements in and envisioned uses for artificial intelligence (AI), few examples of successfully implemented AI innovations exist in primary care (PC) settings. Objectives: To identify priority areas for AI and PC in Ontario, Canada. Methods: A collaborative consultation event engaged multiple stakeholders in a nominal group technique process to generate, discuss, and rank ideas for how AI can support Ontario PC. Results: The consultation process produced nine ranked priorit
Document: Despite widespread advancements in and envisioned uses for artificial intelligence (AI), few examples of successfully implemented AI innovations exist in primary care (PC) settings. Objectives: To identify priority areas for AI and PC in Ontario, Canada. Methods: A collaborative consultation event engaged multiple stakeholders in a nominal group technique process to generate, discuss, and rank ideas for how AI can support Ontario PC. Results: The consultation process produced nine ranked priorities: 1) preventative care and risk profiling, 2) patient self-management of condition(s), 3) management and synthesis of information, 4) improved communication between PC and AI stakeholders, 5) data sharing and interoperability, 6-tie) clinical decision support, 6-tie) administrative staff support, 8) practitioner clerical and routine task support, and 9) increased mental health care capacity and support. Themes emerging from small group discussions about barriers, implementation issues, and resources needed to support the priorities included: equity and the digital divide; system capacity and culture; data availability and quality; legal and ethical issues; user-centered design; patient-centredness; and proper evaluation of AI-driven tool implementation. Discussion: Findings provide guidance for future work on AI and PC. There are immediate opportunities to use existing resources to develop and test AI for priority areas at the patient, provider, and system level. For larger-scale, sustainable innovations, there is a need for longer-term projects that lay foundations around data and interdisciplinary work. Conclusion: Study findings can be used to inform future research and development of AI for PC, and to guide resource planning and allocation.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- academic community and address problem: 1, 2
- academic community and administrative staff: 1
- academic community and adoption communication: 1
- action plan and address challenge: 1
- action plan and address problem: 1, 2, 3
- address problem and administrative staff: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date