Author: Nagappan, Radhika; Flegel, Willy A.; Srivastava, Kshitij; Williams, Eleanor C.; Ryzhov, Ivan; Tuzikov, Alexander; Galanina, Oxana; Shilova, Nadezhda; Sukhikh, Gennady; Perry, Holly; Bovin, Nicolai V.; Henry, Stephen M.
Title: COVIDâ€19 antibody screening with SARSâ€CoVâ€2 red cell kodecytes using routine serologic diagnostic platforms Cord-id: pvpp6q8y Document date: 2021_2_25
ID: pvpp6q8y
Snippet: BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) pandemic is having a major global impact, and the resultant response in the development of new diagnostics is unprecedented. The detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) has a role in managing the pandemic. We evaluated the feasibility of using SARSâ€CoVâ€2 peptide Kode Technologyâ€modified red cells (C19â€kodecytes) to develop an assay compatible with existing routine serologic plat
Document: BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) pandemic is having a major global impact, and the resultant response in the development of new diagnostics is unprecedented. The detection of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2) has a role in managing the pandemic. We evaluated the feasibility of using SARSâ€CoVâ€2 peptide Kode Technologyâ€modified red cells (C19â€kodecytes) to develop an assay compatible with existing routine serologic platforms. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A panel of eight unique red cells modified using Kode Technology functionâ€spacerâ€lipid constructs and bearing short SARSâ€CoVâ€2 peptides was developed (C19â€kodecyte assay). Kodecytes were tested against undiluted expected antibodyâ€negative and â€positive plasma samples in manual tube and three column agglutination technology (CAT) platforms. Parallel analysis with the same peptides in solid phase by enzyme immunoassays was performed. Evaluation samples included >120 expected negative blood donor samples and >140 COVIDâ€19 convalescent plasma samples, with independent serologic analysis from two centers. RESULTS: Specificity (negative reaction rate against expected negative samples) in three different CAT platforms against novel C19â€kodecytes was >91%, which correlated with published literature. Sensitivity (positive reaction rate against expected positive convalescent, PCRâ€confirmed samples) ranged from 82% to 97% compared to 77% with the Abbott Architect SARSâ€CoVâ€2 IgG assay. Manual tube serology was less sensitive than CAT. Enzyme immunoassay results with some Kode Technology constructs also had high sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: C19â€kodecytes are viable for use as serologic reagent red cells for the detection of SARSâ€CoVâ€2 antibody with routine blood antibody screening equipment.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date