Author: Fan, L.; Liu, C.; Li, N.; Liu, H.; Gu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, Y.
Title: Medical treatment of 55 patients with COVID-19 from seven cities in northeast China who fully recovered: a single-center, retrospective, observational study Cord-id: hc0za6fh Document date: 2020_3_30
ID: hc0za6fh
Snippet: Background: COVID-19 is an emerging disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus; no specific medication has been identified to date. We aimed to investigate the administered medications and intervention times for patients who completely recovered from COVID-19. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, and observational study included 55 patients with COVID-19 who were transferred to Shenyang Sixth People's Hospital between January 20 and March 15, 2020. Demographic information, symptoms, laborator
Document: Background: COVID-19 is an emerging disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus; no specific medication has been identified to date. We aimed to investigate the administered medications and intervention times for patients who completely recovered from COVID-19. Methods: This single-center, retrospective, and observational study included 55 patients with COVID-19 who were transferred to Shenyang Sixth People's Hospital between January 20 and March 15, 2020. Demographic information, symptoms, laboratory indicators, treatment processes, and clinical outcomes were collected. Administered drugs and intervention times were compared in 47 and eight patients with mild and severe symptoms, respectively. Findings: All 55 patients recovered. Fifty-three patients (96.36%) received antiviral therapy, including 45 in the mild group (median treatment: 14 days; 17 received umifenovir) and all eight severe-group patients (median treatment: 17.5 days; four received lopinavir/ritonavir). Twenty-nine patients (52.72%) were administered antibiotics, including 21 in the mild group (median treatment: 13.5 days; 15 received moxifloxacin) and all eight in the severe group (median treatment: 9 days; two received linezolid). Moreover, seven patients (12.72%) were treated with glucocorticoids and nine (16.36%) with immunomodulators. Interpretation: Given the 100% recovery rate, early administration of antiviral drugs can be considered. Umifenovir may benefit patients with mild symptoms, while lopinavir/ritonavir may benefit those with severe symptoms. Prophylactic administration of common antibiotics may reduce the risk of co-infection. The use of glucocorticoids is usually not necessary.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- accurate conclusion and administration drug: 1
- accurate conclusion and lopinavir ritonavir: 1
- accurate conclusion and lymphocyte count: 1
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and additional evidence: 1, 2, 3
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adjuvant therapy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and administration drug: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and liver function impairment: 1
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- additional evidence and administration drug: 1, 2, 3, 4
- additional evidence and lymphocyte count: 1
- adjuvant therapy and administration drug: 1, 2, 3, 4
- adjuvant therapy and liver function: 1, 2
- adjuvant therapy and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2
- adjuvant therapy and lopinavir ritonavir umifenovir: 1
- adjuvant therapy and lung shadow: 1
- adjuvant therapy and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3
- administration drug and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date