Author: Alpdagtas, Saadet; Ilhan, Elif; Uysal, Ebru; Sengor, Mustafa; Ustundag, Cem Bulent; Gunduz, Oguzhan
Title: Evaluation of current diagnostic methods for COVID-19 Cord-id: yephzpqd Document date: 2020_12_1
ID: yephzpqd
Snippet: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the agent responsible for the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), which triggers lung failure, pneumonia, and multi-organ dysfunction. This enveloped, positive sense and single-stranded RNA virus can be transmitted through aerosol droplets, direct and indirect contacts. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 is highly contagious and has reached a pandemic level in a few months. Since COVID-19 has caused numerous human casualties and severe economic l
Document: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the agent responsible for the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19), which triggers lung failure, pneumonia, and multi-organ dysfunction. This enveloped, positive sense and single-stranded RNA virus can be transmitted through aerosol droplets, direct and indirect contacts. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 is highly contagious and has reached a pandemic level in a few months. Since COVID-19 has caused numerous human casualties and severe economic loss posing a global threat, the development of readily available, accurate, fast, and cost-effective diagnostic techniques in hospitals and in any places where humans spread the virus is urgently required. COVID-19 can be diagnosed by clinical findings and several laboratory tests. These tests may include virus isolation, nucleic acid-based molecular assays like real-time polymerase chain reactions, antigen or antibody-based immunological assays such as rapid immunochromatographic tests, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, immunofluorescence techniques, and indirect fluorescent antibody techniques, electrochemical sensors, etc. However, current methods should be developed by novel approaches for sensitive, specific, and accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 cases to control and prevent this outbreak. Thus, this review will cover an overview and comparison of multiple reports and commercially available kits that include molecular tests, immunoassays, and sensor-based diagnostic methods for diagnosis of COVID-19. The pros and cons of these methods and future perspectives will be thoroughly evaluated and discussed.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute infection and low contamination: 1, 2, 3
- acute infection and lung epithelial cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- acute infection and magnetic bead: 1
- acute phase and low copy number: 1
- acute phase and low detection: 1, 2
- acute phase and low diagnostic sensitivity: 1, 2
- acute phase and lung epithelial cell: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and local epidemiological situation: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and long incubation period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- acute respiratory syndrome and long last immunity: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and long turnaround time: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute respiratory syndrome and low contamination: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- acute respiratory syndrome and low copy number: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and low detection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61
- acute respiratory syndrome and low detection threshold: 1
- acute respiratory syndrome and low diagnostic sensitivity: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acute respiratory syndrome and low pathogenicity: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- acute respiratory syndrome and lung epithelial cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47
- acute respiratory syndrome and magnetic bead: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date