Selected article for: "assignment effect and information critical risk risk"
Author: Francisca Verdugo-Paiva; Ariel Izcovich; Martin Ragusa; Gabriel Rada
Title: Lopinavir/ritonavir f?or the treatment of COVID-19: A living systematic review protocol
  • Document date: 2020_4_17
    • ID: mhi6w4mr_48
    Snippet: We will assess the risks of bias of other study designs with the ROBINS-I tool (ROBINS-I: Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions) [28] . We will assess the following domains: bias due to confounding, bias in selection of participants into the study, bias in classification of interventions, bias due to deviations from intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention), bias due to missing data, bias in measurement of ou.....
    Document: We will assess the risks of bias of other study designs with the ROBINS-I tool (ROBINS-I: Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions) [28] . We will assess the following domains: bias due to confounding, bias in selection of participants into the study, bias in classification of interventions, bias due to deviations from intended interventions (effect of assignment to intervention), bias due to missing data, bias in measurement of outcomes and bias in the selection of the reported result. We will judge each domain as low risk, moderate risk, serious risk, critical risk, or no information, and evaluate individual bias items as described in ROBINS-I guidance. We will not consider time-varying confounding, as these confounders are not relevant in this setting [28] . We will consider the following factors as baseline potential confounders:

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • follow domain and study design bias: 1
    • follow domain and study design bias risk: 1
    • follow factor and low risk: 1
    • follow factor and moderate risk: 1
    • follow factor and study design: 1, 2
    • information critical risk and intended intervention: 1
    • information critical risk and intervention assignment effect: 1
    • information critical risk and low risk: 1, 2
    • information critical risk and moderate risk: 1, 2
    • information critical risk and study design: 1
    • information critical risk risk and intended intervention: 1
    • information critical risk risk and intervention assignment effect: 1
    • information critical risk risk and low risk: 1, 2
    • information critical risk risk and moderate risk: 1, 2
    • information critical risk risk moderate risk and intended intervention: 1
    • information critical risk risk moderate risk and intervention assignment effect: 1
    • information critical risk risk moderate risk and low risk: 1, 2
    • information critical risk risk moderate risk and moderate risk: 1, 2
    • study design and time vary: 1, 2, 3