Author: Huang, Yilong; Zhang, Zhenguang; Liu, Siyun; Li, Xiang; Yang, Yunhui; Ma, Jiyao; Li, Zhipeng; Zhou, Jialong; Jiang, Yuanming; He, Bo
Title: CT-based radiomics combined with signs: a valuable tool to help radiologist discriminate COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia Cord-id: uprowvlp Document date: 2021_2_17
ID: uprowvlp
Snippet: BACKGROUND: In this COVID-19 pandemic, the differential diagnosis of viral pneumonia is still challenging. We aimed to assess the classification performance of computed tomography (CT)-based CT signs and radiomics features for discriminating COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia. METHODS: A total of 154 patients with confirmed viral pneumonia (COVID-19: 89 cases, influenza pneumonia: 65 cases) were collected retrospectively in this study. Pneumonia signs and radiomics features were extracted from the
Document: BACKGROUND: In this COVID-19 pandemic, the differential diagnosis of viral pneumonia is still challenging. We aimed to assess the classification performance of computed tomography (CT)-based CT signs and radiomics features for discriminating COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia. METHODS: A total of 154 patients with confirmed viral pneumonia (COVID-19: 89 cases, influenza pneumonia: 65 cases) were collected retrospectively in this study. Pneumonia signs and radiomics features were extracted from the initial unenhanced chest CT images to build independent and combined models. The predictive performance of the radiomics model, CT sign model, the combined model was constructed based on the whole dataset and internally invalidated by using 1000-times bootstrap. Diagnostic performance of the models was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: The combined models consisted of 4 significant CT signs and 7 selected features and demonstrated better discrimination performance between COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia than the single radiomics model. For the radiomics model, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.888 (sensitivity, 86.5%; specificity, 78.4%; accuracy, 83.1%), and the AUC was 0.906 (sensitivity, 86.5%; specificity, 81.5%; accuracy, 84.4%) in the CT signs model. After combining CT signs and radiomics features, AUC of the combined model was 0.959 (sensitivity, 89.9%; specificity, 90.7%; accuracy, 90.3%). CONCLUSIONS: CT-based radiomics combined with signs might be a potential method for distinguishing COVID-19 and influenza pneumonia with satisfactory performance. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12880-021-00564-w.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and accuracy specificity: 1, 2
- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and accuracy specificity sensitivity: 1, 2
- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and addition important: 1
- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and logistic regression method: 1, 2, 3
- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- absolute lasso selection shrinkage operator and logistic regression model construct: 1, 2
- accuracy auc and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accuracy auc and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4
- accuracy auc and logistic regression coefficient: 1
- accuracy auc and logistic regression method: 1, 2
- accuracy auc and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- accuracy specificity and additional file: 1
- accuracy specificity and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- accuracy specificity and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- accuracy specificity and logistic regression method: 1
- accuracy specificity and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
- accuracy specificity and logistic regression model construct: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date