Selected article for: "artificial intelligence and automatic diagnosis"

Author: Nabizadeh-Shahre-Babak, Zahra; Karimi, Nader; Khadivi, Pejman; Roshandel, Roshanak; Emami, Ali; Samavi, Shadrokh
Title: Detection of COVID-19 in X-Ray Images by Classification of Bag of Visual Words Using Neural Networks
  • Cord-id: ufg8nl6u
  • Document date: 2021_5_14
  • ID: ufg8nl6u
    Snippet: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. Given that this novel virus most notably affects the human respiratory system, early detection may help prevent severe lung damage, save lives, and help prevent further disease spread. Given the constraints on the healthcare facilities and staff, the role of artificial intelligence for automatic diagnosis is critical. The automatic diagnosis of COVID-19 based on medical images is, how
    Document: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was classified as a pandemic by the World Health Organization in March 2020. Given that this novel virus most notably affects the human respiratory system, early detection may help prevent severe lung damage, save lives, and help prevent further disease spread. Given the constraints on the healthcare facilities and staff, the role of artificial intelligence for automatic diagnosis is critical. The automatic diagnosis of COVID-19 based on medical images is, however, not straightforward. Due to the novelty of the disease, available X-ray datasets are very limited. Furthermore, there is a significant similarity between COVID-19 X-rays and other lung infections. In this paper, these challenges are addressed by proposing an approach consisting of a bag of visual words and a neural network classifier. The proposed method can classify X-ray chest images into non-COVID-19 and COVID-19 with high performance. Three public datasets are used to evaluate the proposed approach. Our best accuracy on the first, second, and third datasets is 96.1, 99.84, and 98 percent. Since detection of COVID-19 is important, sensitivity is used as a criterion. The proposed method’s best sensitivities are 90.32, 99.65, and 91 percent on these datasets, respectively. The experimental results show that extracting features with the bag of visual words results in better classification accuracy than the state-of-the-art techniques.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal normal and accurate classification: 1, 2
    • abnormal normal and accurate diagnosis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • abnormal normal and achieve accuracy: 1
    • abnormal normal and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • abnormal normal and loss function: 1, 2, 3
    • accuracy increase and achieve accuracy: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • accuracy increase and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate classification and achieve accuracy: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate classification and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accurate diagnosis and achieve accuracy: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • accurate diagnosis and local feature: 1
    • accurate diagnosis and local lbp binary pattern: 1, 2
    • accurate diagnosis and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • achieve accuracy and local feature: 1, 2, 3
    • achieve accuracy and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • adaptive machine and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4