Selected article for: "accept likely and logistic regression"

Author: Saluja, Sonali; Nok Lam, Chun; Wishart, Danielle; McMorris, Alec; Cousineau, Michael; Kaplan, Cameron
Title: Disparities in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy among Los Angeles County Adults After Vaccine Authorization
  • Cord-id: fpa10gyf
  • Document date: 2021_9_3
  • ID: fpa10gyf
    Snippet: An equitable COVID-19 vaccine rollout is a necessary piece of the public health strategy to end the current pandemic; however, vaccine hesitancy may present a major hurdle. This study examines racial/ethnic and income-based disparities in vaccine hesitancy in Los Angeles County, a recent epicenter of the pandemic in the US, immediately after the Food and Drug Administration issued its emergency use authorization of a COVID-19 vaccine. We conducted online, stratified cross-sectional surveys of 1,
    Document: An equitable COVID-19 vaccine rollout is a necessary piece of the public health strategy to end the current pandemic; however, vaccine hesitancy may present a major hurdle. This study examines racial/ethnic and income-based disparities in vaccine hesitancy in Los Angeles County, a recent epicenter of the pandemic in the US, immediately after the Food and Drug Administration issued its emergency use authorization of a COVID-19 vaccine. We conducted online, stratified cross-sectional surveys of 1,984 adults living in Los Angeles County between December 2020 and January 2021 to assess hesitancy towards getting a COVID-19 vaccine. We used multivariable logistic regression to predict vaccine hesitancy after adjusting for covariates and calculated weighted population level estimates of hesitancy and reasons for hesitancy. Blacks and Hispanics were significantly more likely to be hesitant than Whites (AOR=3.3, P<0.001; AOR=2.1, P=0.008) as were those in the lowest income group (annual income <$20,000 compared to >$100,000) (AOR=1.8, P=0.009). Additionally, those having no confidence in doing things online (AOR=3.3, P<0.001) were less likely to accept the vaccine than those who were confident. Compared to hesitant White respondents, Black respondents had higher mistrust of the government (36.1% vs 22.1%, P=0.03) and Black and Hispanic respondents were more likely to want to wait to see how the vaccine works (41.2% and 42.0% vs 27.3%, P=0.02 and P=0.006). Our study suggests that culturally appropriate messaging that addresses concerns for lower income and racial/ethnic minority communities, as well as alternatives to online vaccine appointments, are necessary for improving vaccine rollout.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acceptance rate and logistic regression model: 1
    • acceptance rate and los angeles: 1
    • acceptance rate and low income: 1, 2
    • adjusted odd and liver disease: 1, 2
    • adjusted odd and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • adjusted odd and logistic regression model: 1, 2
    • liver disease and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • liver disease and logistic regression model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • liver disease and los angeles: 1, 2
    • liver disease and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    • liver disease and low income person: 1
    • logistic regression and los angeles: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
    • logistic regression and los angeles county: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • logistic regression and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low income group: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • logistic regression model and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • los angeles and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • los angeles and low income group: 1
    • los angeles county and low income: 1, 2