Selected article for: "intravascular coagulation and prothrombin time"

Author: Anwar, Nimra; Tashfeen, Sunila; Akhtar, Fahim; Noor, Afshan; Khan, Saleem Ahmed; Omair, Ahmad
Title: Can disseminated intravascular coagulation scores predict mortality in COVID-19 patients?
  • Cord-id: walayder
  • Document date: 2021_4_8
  • ID: walayder
    Snippet: OBJECTIVES: Complications related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which has been reported to be among the known causes of mortality in such patients. This study aims to analyse the incidence of DIC in COVID-19 non-survivors and to assess the association between DIC and its comorbidities. METHODS: The medical records of 154 non-survivors of COVID-19, hospitalised between April 2020 and July 2020, were retrospectively analysed. The I
    Document: OBJECTIVES: Complications related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which has been reported to be among the known causes of mortality in such patients. This study aims to analyse the incidence of DIC in COVID-19 non-survivors and to assess the association between DIC and its comorbidities. METHODS: The medical records of 154 non-survivors of COVID-19, hospitalised between April 2020 and July 2020, were retrospectively analysed. The International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) criteria for DIC were applied to identify the occurrence of coagulopathy. The receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to assess the association between DIC and its comorbidities. RESULTS: Out of 154 non-survivors, non-overt DIC was observed in 94.8% of the patients, whereas only 5.2% fulfilled the overt criteria of DIC with a mean age 64.6 years. The mortality rate was 4.5 times higher among men than women. The D-dimer level was >250 ng/ml in 68.8% of the patients including 88.9% of the non-overt and 100% of the overt DIC patients. Prothrombin time (PT) in non-overt and overt DIC cases was 17.3 s and 24.4 s, respectively. Thrombotic event and chronic kidney disease were found to be the main predictors of DIC (p < 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively) followed by diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (statistically insignificant). CONCLUSIONS: Our study concludes that the ISTH DIC score cannot predict mortality as the COVID-19 related DIC differs from the sepsis-induced DIC. Among the seriously ill, older patients with comorbidities, increased levels of D-dimer and prolonged PT are more reliable parameters among COVID-19 non-survivors.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal finding and admission time: 1
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission course: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low molecular weight heparin: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and lung parenchyma: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and macrophage release: 1, 2, 3
    • admission course and low incidence: 1
    • admission occur and low incidence: 1
    • admission time and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • admission time and low molecular weight heparin: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • admission time and lung parenchyma: 1, 2
    • low incidence and lung parenchyma: 1
    • low molecular weight heparin and lung parenchyma: 1, 2