Selected article for: "long term outcome and los stay hospital length"

Author: Darvall, Jai N.; Bellomo, Rinaldo; Bailey, Michael; Anstey, James; Pilcher, David
Title: Long-term survival of critically ill patients stratified by pandemic triage categories: a retrospective cohort study
  • Cord-id: i6jv5iba
  • Document date: 2021_3_9
  • ID: i6jv5iba
    Snippet: Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented demand for ICU, with the need to triage admissions along with the development of ICU triage criteria. However, how these criteria relate to outcomes in patients already admitted to ICU is unknown, as is the incremental ICU capacity that triage of these patients might create given existing admission practices. Research Question What is the short and long-term survival of low vs. high priority patients for ICU admission according to current
    Document: Background The COVID-19 pandemic has led to unprecedented demand for ICU, with the need to triage admissions along with the development of ICU triage criteria. However, how these criteria relate to outcomes in patients already admitted to ICU is unknown, as is the incremental ICU capacity that triage of these patients might create given existing admission practices. Research Question What is the short and long-term survival of low vs. high priority patients for ICU admission according to current pandemic triage criteria? Study Design and Methods: We analysed prospectively collected registry data (2007-2018) in 23 ICUs in Victoria, Australia, with probabilistic linkage with death registries. After excluding elective surgery, we stratified admissions by existing ICU triage protocol prioritization as low (age >85 years, or severe chronic illness, or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score = 0 or ≥12), medium (SOFA score 8-11) or high (SOFA score 1-7) priority. The primary outcome was long-term survival. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, ICU length of stay (LOS) and bed-day usage. Results We studied 126,687 ICU admissions. After five-years of follow up, 1093/3296 (33%, 95%CI 32%-34%) of “low-priority” patients aged >85 years or with severe chronic illness, and 86/332 (26%, 95%CI 24%-28%) with a SOFA score ≥12 were still alive. 63/290 [22%, 95% CI 17%-27%] of patients in these groups followed for 10 years were still alive. Together, low priority patients accounted for 27% of all ICU bed-days, and had lower in-hospital mortality (22%) than than high priority patients (28%). Among non-survivors, low-priority admissions had shorter ICU LOS than medium or high-priority admissions. Interpretation Current SOFA-score or age or severe comorbidity-based ICU pandemic triage protocols exclude patients with a close to 80% hospital survival, a >30% five-year survival and 27% of ICU bed-day use. These findings imply the need for stronger evidence-based ICU triage protocols.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absent severe and acute severity: 1
    • acute physiology and admission diagnosis: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute physiology and admission organ dysfunction: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional aspect: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional outcome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission diagnosis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission level: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission organ dysfunction: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission practice: 1, 2
    • acute respiratory syndrome and admission reason: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
    • acute respiratory syndrome and long medium: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • acute severity and admission diagnosis: 1, 2, 3
    • acute severity and admission level: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute severity and admission organ dysfunction: 1, 2
    • acute severity and long medium: 1