Author: Gidari, Anna; Nofri, Marco; Saccarelli, Luca; Bastianelli, Sabrina; Sabbatini, Samuele; Bozza, Silvia; Camilloni, Barbara; Fusco-Moffa, Igino; Monari, Claudia; De Robertis, Edoardo; Mencacci, Antonella; Francisci, Daniela
Title: Is recurrence possible in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Case series and systematic review of literature Cord-id: z0frgm7s Document date: 2020_10_10
ID: z0frgm7s
Snippet: Can a patient diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) be infected again? This question is still unsolved. We tried to analyze local and literature cases with a positive respiratory swab after recovery. We collected data from symptomatic patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Italian Umbria Region that, after recovery, were again positive for SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory tract specimens. Samples were also assessed for infectivity in vitro. A systemati
Document: Can a patient diagnosed with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) be infected again? This question is still unsolved. We tried to analyze local and literature cases with a positive respiratory swab after recovery. We collected data from symptomatic patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Italian Umbria Region that, after recovery, were again positive for SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory tract specimens. Samples were also assessed for infectivity in vitro. A systematic review of similar cases reported in the literature was performed. The study population was composed of 9 patients during a 4-month study period. Among the new positive samples, six were inoculated in Vero-E6 cells and showed no growth and negative molecular test in culture supernatants. All patients were positive for IgG against SARS-CoV-2 nucleoprotein and/or S protein. Conducting a review of the literature, 1350 similar cases have been found. The presumptive reactivation occurred in 34.5 days on average (standard deviation, SD, 18.7 days) after COVID-19 onset, when the 5.6% of patients presented fever and the 27.6% symptoms. The outcome was favorable in 96.7% of patients, while the 1.1% of them were still hospitalized at the time of data collection and the 2.1% died. Several hypotheses have been formulated to explain new positive respiratory samples after confirmed negativity. According to this study, the phenomenon seems to be due to the prolonged detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA traces in respiratory samples of recovered patients. The failure of the virus to replicate in vitro suggests its inability to replicate in vivo.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute respiratory syndrome and additional day: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- acute respiratory syndrome and additional nasopharyngeal swab: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and administer therapy: 1, 2, 3
- acute respiratory syndrome and lung involvement: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date