Selected article for: "active immune response and immune response"

Author: San Segundo, David; Arnáiz de las Revillas, Francisco; Lamadrid-Perojo, Patricia; Comins-Boo, Alejandra; González-Rico, Claudia; Alonso-Peña, Marta; Irure-Ventura, Juan; Olmos, José Manuel; Fariñas, María Carmen; López-Hoyos, Marcos
Title: Innate and Adaptive Immune Assessment at Admission to Predict Clinical Outcome in COVID-19 Patients
  • Cord-id: z1l6oyjh
  • Document date: 2021_7_29
  • ID: z1l6oyjh
    Snippet: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many studies have been carried out to evaluate different immune system components to search for prognostic biomarkers of the disease. A broad multiparametric antibody panel of cellular and humoral components of the innate and the adaptative immune response in patients with active SARS-CoV-2 infection has been evaluated in this study. A total of 155 patients were studied at admission into our center and were categorized according to the requirement of oxygen therapy
    Document: During the COVID-19 pandemic, many studies have been carried out to evaluate different immune system components to search for prognostic biomarkers of the disease. A broad multiparametric antibody panel of cellular and humoral components of the innate and the adaptative immune response in patients with active SARS-CoV-2 infection has been evaluated in this study. A total of 155 patients were studied at admission into our center and were categorized according to the requirement of oxygen therapy as mild or severe (the latter being those with the requirement). The patients with severe disease were older and had high ferritin, D-dimer, C-reactive protein, troponin, interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, and neutrophilia with lymphopenia at admission. Moreover, the patients with mild symptoms had significantly increased circulating non-classical monocytes, innate lymphoid cells, and regulatory NK cells. In contrast, severe patients had a low frequency of Th1 and regulatory T cells with increased activated and exhausted CD8 phenotype (CD8(+)CD38(+)HLADR(+) and CD8(+)CD27(−)CD28(−), respectively). The predictive model included age, ferritin, D-dimer, lymph counts, C4, CD8(+)CD27(−)CD28(−), and non-classical monocytes in the logistic regression analysis. The model predicted severity with an area under the curve of 78%. Both innate and adaptive immune parameters could be considered potential predictive biomarkers of the prognosis of COVID-19 disease.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • absolute count and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • absolute count and admission cohort: 1, 2, 3
    • absolute count and admission day: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • absolute lymphocyte count and active disease: 1
    • absolute lymphocyte count and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2
    • absolute lymphocyte count and admission cohort: 1, 2, 3
    • absolute lymphocyte count and admission day: 1, 2, 3
    • absolute number and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • absolute number and adaptive innate: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • activation induce and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2
    • activation induce and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome cause: 1
    • activation induce and adaptive antiviral response: 1
    • activation induce and adaptive innate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
    • active disease and acute ards respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3
    • active disease and adaptive innate: 1, 2, 3
    • active disease and admission day: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and adaptive innate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission cohort: 1, 2, 3
    • acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and admission day: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25