Author: Kovoor, Joshua G.; Tivey, David R.; Williamson, Penny; Tan, Lorwai; Kopunic, Helena S.; Babidge, Wendy J.; Collinson, Trevor G.; Hewett, Peter J.; Hugh, Thomas J.; Padbury, Robert T. A.; Frydenberg, Mark; Douglas, Richard G.; Kok, Jen; Maddern, Guy J.
Title: Screening and Testing for COVIDâ€19 Before Surgery Cord-id: if1wy45r Document date: 2020_8_7
ID: if1wy45r
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Preoperative screening for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) aims to preserve surgical safety for both patients and surgical teams. This rapid review provides an evaluation of current evidence with input from clinical experts to produce guidance for screening for active COVIDâ€19 in a low prevalence setting. METHODS: An initial search of PubMed (until 6 May 2020) was combined with targeted searches of both PubMed and Google Scholar until 1 July 2020. Findings were streamlined fo
Document: BACKGROUND: Preoperative screening for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) aims to preserve surgical safety for both patients and surgical teams. This rapid review provides an evaluation of current evidence with input from clinical experts to produce guidance for screening for active COVIDâ€19 in a low prevalence setting. METHODS: An initial search of PubMed (until 6 May 2020) was combined with targeted searches of both PubMed and Google Scholar until 1 July 2020. Findings were streamlined for clinical relevance through the advice of an expert working group that included seven senior surgeons and a senior medical virologist. RESULTS: Patient history should be examined for potential exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSâ€CoVâ€2). Hyposmia and hypogeusia may present as early symptoms of COVIDâ€19, and can potentially discriminate from other influenzaâ€like illnesses. Reverse transcriptionâ€polymerase chain reaction (RTâ€PCR) is the gold standard diagnostic test to confirm SARSâ€CoVâ€2 infection, and although sensitivity can be improved with repeated testing, the decision to retest should incorporate clinical history and the local supply of diagnostic resources. At present, routine serological testing has little utility for diagnosing acute infection. To appropriately conduct preoperative testing, the temporal dynamics of SARSâ€CoVâ€2 must be considered. Relative to other thoracic imaging modalities, computed tomography has the greatest utility for characterising pulmonary involvement in COVIDâ€19 patients who have been diagnosed by RTâ€PCR. CONCLUSION: Through a rapid review of the literature and advice from a clinical expert working group, evidenceâ€based recommendations have been produced for the preoperative screening of surgical patients with suspected COVIDâ€19.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abstract title and acute sars infection: 1, 2
- abstract title and acute sars infection diagnosis: 1
- abstract title and live virus: 1
- abstract title screening and acid amplification: 1
- abstract title screening and live virus: 1
- accepted article and acute sars infection: 1
- accepted article and local availability: 1
- acid amplification and active sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4
- acid amplification and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- acid amplification and acute sars infection diagnosis: 1
- acid amplification and live virus: 1
- active sars infection and acute sars infection: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- acute sars infection and live virus: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- acute sars infection and local availability: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date