Selected article for: "fecal swab and nucleic acid"

Author: Wang, S.; Tu, J.; Sheng, Y.
Title: Clinical characteristics and fecal-oral transmission potential of patients with COVID-19
  • Cord-id: g3i8cz1u
  • Document date: 2020_5_6
  • ID: g3i8cz1u
    Snippet: Background: A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 generate negative pharyngeal swab viral nucleic acid test results but test positive using fecal samples. However, fecal-oral transmission of COVID-19 has not been established to date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the duration of fecal swab positivity in COVID-19 patients after pharyngeal swab nucleic acid test turned negative and to explore its potential for fecal-oral transmission. Methods: A retrospective analysis of c
    Document: Background: A significant proportion of patients with COVID-19 generate negative pharyngeal swab viral nucleic acid test results but test positive using fecal samples. However, fecal-oral transmission of COVID-19 has not been established to date. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the duration of fecal swab positivity in COVID-19 patients after pharyngeal swab nucleic acid test turned negative and to explore its potential for fecal-oral transmission. Methods: A retrospective analysis of clinical records, laboratory results, and chest computed tomography (CT) findings of 17 COVID-19 patients confirmed by laboratory tests from January 22 to February 7, 2020 at a tertiary hospital was performed. The potential of fecal-oral transmission was assessed by detecting the presence of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in fecal swab samples. Results: A total of 16 patients (94.1%) had fever; other symptoms included dry cough, dyspnea, nausea, diarrhea, sore throat, fatigue, and muscle pain. Three patients had decreased white blood cell counts, 7 had decreased lymphocyte numbers, and 7 had increased C-reactive protein levels. Fecal samples of 11 patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid, of whom the time for the fecal samples to become SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid-negative was longer in 10 patients than that for pharyngeal swab samples, and only one case exhibited a shorter time for his fecal sample to become SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid-negative compared to his pharyngeal swab sample. The remaining 6 patients were negative for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in fecal samples. Conclusion: In COVID-19 patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid in both pharyngeal swab and fecal samples, the time for the fecal samples to become SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid-negative was generally longer than that in pharyngeal swab samples. However, there is currently no evidence demonstrating that the virus can be transmitted through the fecal-oral route.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • acid negative and lung ground glass opacity: 1
    • acid negative and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acid negative group and lymphocyte count: 1
    • acid positive and lopinavir ritonavir: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • acid positive and lung ground glass opacity: 1, 2, 3
    • acid positive and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acid positive group and lymphocyte count: 1
    • lopinavir ritonavir and lung ground glass opacity: 1
    • lopinavir ritonavir and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • lung ground glass opacity and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8