Author: Alishaq, Moza; Jeremijenko, Andrew; Al-Kanaani, Zeina; Nafady-Hego, Hanaa; Jboor, Diana H.; Saba, Rosaline; Al-Ajmi, Jameela; Alansari, Nasser Asad; Thomas, Anil George; Fareh, Sameera Bihi; Vinoy, Suni; Nooh, Maryam; Alanzi, Nadya; Abou-Samra, Abdul-Badi; Butt, Adeel Ajwad
Title: Prevalence and risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection and seroprevalence among clinical and non-clinical staff in a national healthcare system Cord-id: ip9ky6hx Document date: 2021_9_30
ID: ip9ky6hx
Snippet: BACKGROUND: While many studies have reported the rate and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers (HCWs), there are scant data regarding the impact of employment type and job grades upon such risk. METHODS: We determined the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on a positive nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) PCR among employees of a large national healthcare system. Antibody testing was performed on those who agreed to provide a blood sample. Using logistic regression analysis, we determined
Document: BACKGROUND: While many studies have reported the rate and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers (HCWs), there are scant data regarding the impact of employment type and job grades upon such risk. METHODS: We determined the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on a positive nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) PCR among employees of a large national healthcare system. Antibody testing was performed on those who agreed to provide a blood sample. Using logistic regression analysis, we determined the risk of infection (PCR+) associated with demographic characteristics, job family and job grade. RESULTS: We identified 35,075 staff (30,849 full-time, 4,226 outsourced) between March 1-October 31, 2020. Among full-time employees, 78.0% had a NPS (11.8% positive). Among outsourced staff, 94.4% had a NPS (31.1% positive). Antibody testing was performed on 33.9% full-time employees (13.0% reactive), and on 39.1% of the outsourced staff (47.0% reactive). PCR-positivity was higher among outsourced staff (31.0% vs. 18.3% in non-clinical and 9.0% in clinical full-time employees) and those in the low-grade vs. mid-grade and high-grade job categories. Male sex (OR 1.88), non-clinical job family (OR 1.21), low-grade job category (OR 3.71) and being an outsourced staff (OR 2.09) were associated with a higher risk of infection. CONCLUSION: HCWs are a diverse population with varying risk of infection. Clinical staff are at a lower risk likely due to increased awareness and infection prevention measures. Risk is higher for those in the lower socioeconomic strata. Infection is more likely to occur in non-healthcare setting than within the healthcare facilities.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- administrative staff and living condition: 1
- administrative staff and logistic regression analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- administrative staff and low incidence: 1
- administrative staff and low prevalence: 1, 2
- living condition and logistic regression analysis: 1
- living condition and low income: 1, 2
- logistic regression analysis and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- logistic regression analysis and low income: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- logistic regression analysis and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date