Mismatch: A comparative study of vitamin D status in British-Bangladeshi migrants

Smith, N.; Sievert, L.; Muttukrishna, S.; Begum, K.; Murphy, L.; Sharmeen, T.; Gunu, R.; Chowdhury, O.; Bentley, G. R.

Background and objectives: Low levels of vitamin D among dark-skinned migrants to northern latitudes and increased risks for associated pathologies illustrate an evolutionary mismatch between an environment of high ultraviolet (UV) radiation to which such migrants are adapted and the low-UV environment to which they migrate. Recently, low levels of vitamin D have also been associated with higher risks for contracting COVID-19. South Asians in the UK have higher risk for low vitamin D levels. In this study, we assessed vitamin D status of British-Bangladeshi migrants compared to white British residents and Bangladeshis still living in Bangladesh ('sedentees'). Methodology: The cross-sectional study compared vitamin D levels among 149 women aged 35-59, comprising British-Bangladeshi migrants (n=50), white UK neighbors (n=54) and Bangladeshi sedentees (n=45). Analyses comprised multivariate models to assess serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and associations with anthropometric, lifestyle, health and migration factors. Results: Vitamin D levels in Bangladeshi migrants were very low: mean 25(OH)D = 32.2nmol/L +/- 13.0, with 29% of migrants classified as deficient (<25nmol/L) and 94% deficient or insufficient ([≤]50nmol/L). Mean levels of vitamin D were significantly lower among British-Bangladeshis compared to Bangladeshi sedentees (50.9nmol/L +/- 13.3), presumably due to less exposure to sunlight following migration; levels were also lower than in white British women (55.3nmol/L +/- 20.9). Lower levels of vitamin D were associated with increased body mass index and low iron status. Conclusions and implications: Recommending supplements to Bangladeshi migrants could prevent potentially adverse health outcomes associated with vitamin D deficiency.