Author: Rizzello, Prof Fernando; Calabrese, Carlo; Salice, Marco; Calandrini, Lucia; Privitera, Hana; Melotti, Laura; Peruzzi, Giulia; Dussias, Nikolas; Belluzzi, Andrea; Scaioli, Eleonora; Decorato, Anastasio; Siniscalchi, Antonio; Filippone, Eleonora; Laureti, Prof Silvio; Rottoli, Matteo; Poggioli, Prof Gilberto; Gionchetti, Prof. Paolo
Title: COVID-19 in IBD: the experience of a single tertiary IBD center Cord-id: yn7mj8qp Document date: 2020_12_26
ID: yn7mj8qp
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Italy has been one of the most affected countries in the world by COVID-19. There has been increasing concern regarding the impact of COVIDâ€19 on patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly in patients treated with immunosuppressants or biologics. The aim of our study is to understand the incidence of COVID-19 in a large cohort of patients with IBD. Furthermore, we analyzed possible risk factors for infection and severity of COVID-19. METHODS: This was an observati
Document: BACKGROUND: Italy has been one of the most affected countries in the world by COVID-19. There has been increasing concern regarding the impact of COVIDâ€19 on patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), particularly in patients treated with immunosuppressants or biologics. The aim of our study is to understand the incidence of COVID-19 in a large cohort of patients with IBD. Furthermore, we analyzed possible risk factors for infection and severity of COVID-19. METHODS: This was an observational study evaluating the impact of COVID-19 on IBD patients in a single tertiary center. A 23 multiple-choice-question anonymous survey was administered to 1200 patients with IBD between March 10(th) and June 10(th) 2020. RESULTS: 1158 questionnaires were analyzed. The majority of patients had Crohn's disease (CD) (60%) and most of them were in clinical remission. Among the 26 patients (2.2%) who tested positive for COVID-19, only 5 (3CD) were on biological treatment and none required hospitalization. Two patients died and were on treatment with mesalazine only. Of the 1158 patients, 521 were on biological therapy, which was discontinued in 85 (16.3%) and delayed in 195 patients (37.4%). A worsening of IBD symptoms was observed in 200 patients on biological therapy (38.4%). Most of these patients, 189 (94.5%), had stopped or delayed biological treatment, while 11 (5.5%) had continued their therapy regularly (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data are in line with the current literature and confirm a higher incidence compared to the general population. Biological therapy for IBD seems to not be a risk factor for infection and should not be discontinued in order to avoid IBD relapse.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
- acute ards respiratory distress syndrome and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- logistic regression and low incidence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22
- logistic regression and madrid region: 1, 2
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date