Author: Daniel B Larremore; Bailey K Fosdick; Kate M Bubar; Sam Zhang; Stephen M Kissler; C. Jessica E. Metcalf; Caroline Buckee; Yonatan Grad
Title: Estimating SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and epidemiological parameters with uncertainty from serological surveys Document date: 2020_4_20
ID: c4cs14ja_50
Snippet: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint For four sampling strategies, n = 1000 tests were allocated to age groups with negative tests (grey) and positive tests (colors) as shown, for a test with 93% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity. The MDI strategy shown was designed to optimize estimation of R eff . (E-H) Age-group seroprevalence estimates θ i are shown as boxplots (boxes 90% CIs, whiskers 95% CIs); dots in.....
Document: is the (which was not peer-reviewed) The copyright holder for this preprint For four sampling strategies, n = 1000 tests were allocated to age groups with negative tests (grey) and positive tests (colors) as shown, for a test with 93% sensitivity and 97.5% specificity. The MDI strategy shown was designed to optimize estimation of R eff . (E-H) Age-group seroprevalence estimates θ i are shown as boxplots (boxes 90% CIs, whiskers 95% CIs); dots indicate the true values from which data were sampled. Note the decrease uncertainty for boxes with higher sampling rates. (I) Age-group seroprevalences were weighted by population demographics to produce overall seroprevalence estimates, shown as probability densities with 90% credible intervals shaded and highlighted with dashed lines. (J) Age-group seroprevalences were used to estimate R eff under status quo ante contact patterns, shown as probability densities with 90% credible intervals shaded and highlighted with dashed lines. Dashed lines indicate true values from which the data were sampled. Each distribution depicts inference outcomes from a single sent of stochastically sampled data; no averaging is done. Note that although uniform sample allocation produces a more confident estimate of overall seroprevalence, MDI produces a more confident estimate of R eff since it allocates more samples to age groups most relevant to model dynamics.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Age group and dynamic model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- Age group and negative test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36
- Age group and overall seroprevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- Age group and population demographic: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
- Age group and positive test: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72
- Age group and relevant age group: 1, 2, 3, 4
- Age group and sampling rate: 1, 2
- Age group and sampling strategy: 1
- Age group and seroprevalence estimate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
- age group seroprevalence and overall seroprevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- age group seroprevalence and population demographic: 1
- age group seroprevalence and seroprevalence estimate: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date