Author: Lin, Dong D.; Wu, Yunhong; Toom, Sudhamshi; Sheth, Niki; Becker, Kevin; Burdette-Radoux, Susan; D'Silva, James; Huang, Yiwu; Lipshitz, Jay; Meghal, Trishala; Mo, Lan; Murthy, Pooja; Rubin, Philip; Natarajan, Vijaya; Donahue, Bernadine; Xu, Yiqing
Title: Clinical Determinants Differentiating the Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Cancer Patients: Hospital Care or Home Recovery Cord-id: jbl8iyjy Document date: 2021_2_16
ID: jbl8iyjy
Snippet: Background: Cancer patients may carry a worse prognosis with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most of the previous studies described the outcomes of hospitalized cancer patients. We aimed to study the clinical factors differentiating patients requiring hospital care vs. home recovery, and the trajectory of their anti-cancer treatment. Methods: This study was conducted in a community cancer center in New York City. Eligible patients were those who had cancer history and were diagnosed of SARS-CoV-2 infectio
Document: Background: Cancer patients may carry a worse prognosis with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most of the previous studies described the outcomes of hospitalized cancer patients. We aimed to study the clinical factors differentiating patients requiring hospital care vs. home recovery, and the trajectory of their anti-cancer treatment. Methods: This study was conducted in a community cancer center in New York City. Eligible patients were those who had cancer history and were diagnosed of SARS-CoV-2 infection between March 1 and May 30, 2020, with confirmatory SARs-CoV-2 virus test or antibody test. Four groups were constructed: (A) hospitalized and survived, (B) hospitalized requiring intubation and/or deceased, (C) non-hospitalized, asymptomatic, with suspicious CT image findings, close exposure, or positive antibody test, and (D) non-hospitalized and symptomatic. Results: One hundred and six patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-five patients (33.0%) required hospitalization and 13 (12.3%) died. Thirty (28.3%) patients were asymptomatic and 41 (38.7%) were symptomatic and recovered at home. Comparing to patients who recovered at home, hospitalized patients were composed of older patients (median age 71 vs. 63 years old, p = 0.000299), more who received negative impact treatment (62.9 vs. 32.4%, p = 0.0036) that mostly represented myelosuppressive chemotherapy (45.7 vs. 23.9%, p = 0.0275), and more patients with poorer baseline performance status (PS ≥ 2 25.7 vs. 2.8%, p = 0.0007). Hypoxemia (35% in group A vs. 73.3% in group B, p = 0.0271) at presentation was significant to predict mortality in hospitalized patients. The median cumulative hospital stay for discharged patients was 16 days (range 5–60). The median duration of persistent positivity of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was 28 days (range 10–86). About 52.9% of patients who survived hospitalization and required anti-cancer treatment reinitiated therapy. Ninety-two percent of the asymptomatic patients and 51.7% of the symptomatic patients who recovered at home continued treatment on schedule and almost all reinitiated treatment after recovery. Conclusions: Cancer patients may have a more severe status of SARS-CoV-2 infection after receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Avoidance should be considered in older patients with poor performance status. More than two thirds of patients exhibit minimal to moderate symptoms, and many of them can continue or restart their anti-cancer treatment upon recovery.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- abnormal value and admission time: 1
- abnormal value and liver function: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- abnormal value and liver function abnormality: 1
- abnormal value and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- absence presence and absolute neutrophil count: 1
- absence presence and active treatment: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- absence presence and admission rate: 1
- absence presence and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
- absence presence and liver function: 1, 2
- absence presence and logistic model: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- absence presence and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63
- absence presence and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and active treatment: 1
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and active treatment cancer: 1
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and admission rate: 1
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and admission time: 1, 2
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and logistic model: 1, 2
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- absolute alc lymphocyte count and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date