Selected article for: "additional challenge and SARS cov"

Author: Kates, Olivia S; Diekema, Douglas S; Blumberg, Emily A
Title: Should healthcare institutions mandate SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for staff?
  • Cord-id: xjgo8vdt
  • Document date: 2021_4_2
  • ID: xjgo8vdt
    Snippet: Healthcare workers have been prioritized for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but vaccine hesitancy among workers may limit uptake. Institutions may wish to consider SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers, but such proposals raise important ethical questions. Arguments supporting mandates emphasize the proposed favorable balance of harms and benefits for both individuals and communities, as well as moral duties of healthcare workers and organizations. Arguments in opposition seek to challenge
    Document: Healthcare workers have been prioritized for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but vaccine hesitancy among workers may limit uptake. Institutions may wish to consider SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandates for healthcare workers, but such proposals raise important ethical questions. Arguments supporting mandates emphasize the proposed favorable balance of harms and benefits for both individuals and communities, as well as moral duties of healthcare workers and organizations. Arguments in opposition seek to challenge some claims about utility and raise additional concerns about infringement on autonomy, damage to organizational relationships, and injustice. While available SARS-CoV-2 vaccines remain under an experimental designation, mandates may be excessively problematic, but following approval by the Food and Drug Administration mandates may be reconsidered. The authors summarize ethical arguments and practical considerations, concluding that mandates may be ethically permissible in select circumstances.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1