Author: Pung, R.; Clapham, H. E.; Lee, V. J.; Kucharski, A. J.; group, CMMID COVID-19 working
Title: Relative role of border restrictions, case finding and contact tracing in controlling SARS-CoV-2 in the presence of undetected transmission Cord-id: jzvtymyx Document date: 2021_5_9
ID: jzvtymyx
Snippet: Background Several countries have controlled the spread of COVID-19 through varying combinations of border restrictions, case finding, contact tracing and careful calibration on the resumption of domestic activities. However, evaluating the effectiveness of these measures based on observed cases alone is challenging as it does not reflect the transmission dynamics of missed infections. Methods Combining data on notified local COVID-19 cases with known and unknown sources of infections (i.e. link
Document: Background Several countries have controlled the spread of COVID-19 through varying combinations of border restrictions, case finding, contact tracing and careful calibration on the resumption of domestic activities. However, evaluating the effectiveness of these measures based on observed cases alone is challenging as it does not reflect the transmission dynamics of missed infections. Methods Combining data on notified local COVID-19 cases with known and unknown sources of infections (i.e. linked and unlinked cases) in Singapore in 2020 with a transmission model, we reconstructed the incidence of missed infections and estimated the relative effectiveness of different types of outbreak control. We also examined implications for estimation of key real-time metrics -- the reproduction number and ratio of unlinked to linked cases, using observed data only as compared to accounting for missed infections. Findings Prior to the partial lockdown in Singapore, initiated in April 2020, we estimated 89% (95%CI 75-99%) of the infections caused by notified cases were contact traced, but only 12.5% (95%CI 2-69%) of the infections caused by missed infectors were identified. We estimated that the reproduction number was 1.23 (95%CI 0.98-1.54) after accounting for missed infections but was 0.90 (95%CI 0.79-1.1) based on notified cases alone. At the height of the outbreak, the ratio of missed to notified infections was 34.1 (95%CI 26.0-46.6) but the ratio of unlinked to linked infections was 0.81 (95%CI 0.59-1.36). Our results suggest that when case finding and contact tracing identifies at least 50% and 20% of the infections caused by missed and notified cases respectively, the reproduction number could be reduced by more than 14%, rising to 20% when contact tracing is 80% effective. Interpretation Depending on the relative effectiveness of border restrictions, case finding and contact tracing, unobserved outbreak dynamics can vary greatly. Commonly used metrics to evaluate outbreak control -- typically based on notified data -- could therefore misrepresent the true underlying outbreak. Funding Ministry of Health, Singapore.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date