Author: Liu, Huanhuan; Ren, Hua; Wu, Zengbin; Xu, He; Zhang, Shuhai; Li, Jinning; Hou, Liang; Chi, Runmin; Zheng, Hui; Chen, Yanhong; Duan, Shaofeng; Li, Huimin; Xie, Zongyu; Wang, Dengbin
Title: CT radiomics facilitates more accurate diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia: compared with CO-RADS Cord-id: jpr6pw7i Document date: 2021_1_7
ID: jpr6pw7i
Snippet: BACKGROUND: Limited data was available for rapid and accurate detection of COVID-19 using CT-based machine learning model. This study aimed to investigate the value of chest CT radiomics for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia compared with clinical model and COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO-RADS), and develop an open-source diagnostic tool with the constructed radiomics model. METHODS: This study enrolled 115 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and 435 non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients (training datase
Document: BACKGROUND: Limited data was available for rapid and accurate detection of COVID-19 using CT-based machine learning model. This study aimed to investigate the value of chest CT radiomics for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia compared with clinical model and COVID-19 reporting and data system (CO-RADS), and develop an open-source diagnostic tool with the constructed radiomics model. METHODS: This study enrolled 115 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and 435 non-COVID-19 pneumonia patients (training dataset, n = 379; validation dataset, n = 131; testing dataset, n = 40). Key radiomics features extracted from chest CT images were selected to build a radiomics signature using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Clinical and clinico-radiomics combined models were constructed. The combined model was further validated in the viral pneumonia cohort, and compared with performance of two radiologists using CO-RADS. The diagnostic performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) analysis, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Eight radiomics features and 5 clinical variables were selected to construct the combined radiomics model, which outperformed the clinical model in diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia with an area under the ROC (AUC) of 0.98 and good calibration in the validation cohort. The combined model also performed better in distinguishing COVID-19 from other viral pneumonia with an AUC of 0.93 compared with 0.75 (P = 0.03) for clinical model, and 0.69 (P = 0.008) or 0.82 (P = 0.15) for two trained radiologists using CO-RADS. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined model can be achieved to 0.85 and 0.90. The DCA confirmed the clinical utility of the combined model. An easy-to-use open-source diagnostic tool was developed using the combined model. CONCLUSIONS: The combined radiomics model outperformed clinical model and CO-RADS for diagnosing COVID-19 pneumonia, which can facilitate more rapid and accurate detection.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- additional file and logistic regression analysis: 1
- additional file and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3
- adenovirus rhinovirus and logistic regression: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
- adenovirus rhinovirus and lymphocyte count: 1
- adenovirus rhinovirus respiratory syncytial virus and logistic regression: 1, 2
- logistic regression analysis and lung cancer: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- logistic regression analysis and lymph node: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
- logistic regression analysis and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73
- logistic regression analysis and lymphocyte count neutrophil ratio: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
- logistic regression analysis and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21
- logistic regression analysis and machine learning approach: 1, 2
- lung cancer and lymph node: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57
- lung cancer and lymph node size: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- lung cancer and lymphocyte count: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
- lung cancer and lymphocyte count neutrophil ratio: 1, 2
- lung cancer and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
- lung cancer and machine learning approach: 1, 2, 3
- lymphocyte count and machine learning: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
- lymphocyte count and machine learning approach: 1, 2, 3
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date