Selected article for: "association quality and high quality"

Author: Burstein, David S; Liss, David T; Linder, Jeffrey A
Title: Association of Primary Care Physician Compensation Incentives and Quality of Care in the United States, 2012-2016.
  • Cord-id: 1n6l0utu
  • Document date: 2021_4_14
  • ID: 1n6l0utu
    Snippet: BACKGROUND Physician compensation incentives may have positive or negative effects on clinical quality. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between various physician compensation incentives on technical indicators of primary care quality. DESIGN Cross-sectional, nationally representative retrospective analysis. PARTICIPANTS Visits by adults to primary care physicians in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012-2016. We analyzed 49,580 sampled visits, representing 1.45 billion primar
    Document: BACKGROUND Physician compensation incentives may have positive or negative effects on clinical quality. OBJECTIVE To assess the association between various physician compensation incentives on technical indicators of primary care quality. DESIGN Cross-sectional, nationally representative retrospective analysis. PARTICIPANTS Visits by adults to primary care physicians in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2012-2016. We analyzed 49,580 sampled visits, representing 1.45 billion primary care visits. MAIN MEASURES We assessed the association between 5 compensation incentives - quality measure performance, patient experience scores, individual productivity, practice financial performance, or practice efficiency - and 10 high-value and 7 low-value care measures as well as high-value and low-value care composites. KEY RESULTS Quality measure performance was an incentive in 22% of visits; patient experience scores, 17%; individual productivity, 57%; practice financial performance, 63%; and practice efficiency, 12%. In adjusted models, none of the compensation incentives were consistently associated with individual high- and low-value measures. None of the compensation incentives were associated with high- or low-value care composites. For example, quality measure performance compensation was not significantly associated with high-value care (visits with quality incentive, 47% of eligible measures met; without quality incentive, 43%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.91 to 1.15) or low-value care (aOR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.82-1.19). Physician compensation incentives that might be expected to increase low-value care did not: patient experience (aOR for low-value care composite, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65-1.05), individual productivity (aOR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.88-1.22), and practice financial performance (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.81-1.36). CONCLUSION In this retrospective, cross-sectional, nationally representative analysis of care in the United States, physician compensation incentives were not generally associated with more or less high- or low-value care.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • Try single phrases listed below for: 1