Author: Zobeck, Bryan; Carson, Erin; MacDowell, Martin; Hunt, Aaron; Reeder, Austin
Title: Appointment attendance and patient perception of driveâ€up INR testing in a rural anticoagulation clinic during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic Cord-id: 3w3cw4tu Document date: 2021_1_20
ID: 3w3cw4tu
Snippet: INTRODUCTION: The Anticoagulation Forum and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend driveâ€up international normalized ratio (INR) testing to combat INR nonâ€adherence and increase safety during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) pandemic. Patient perceptions and impact on attendance have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess appointment volume and patient perception after initiation of driveâ€up INR testing in a rural pharmacistâ€managed anticoagulation clinic. ME
Document: INTRODUCTION: The Anticoagulation Forum and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend driveâ€up international normalized ratio (INR) testing to combat INR nonâ€adherence and increase safety during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVIDâ€19) pandemic. Patient perceptions and impact on attendance have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To assess appointment volume and patient perception after initiation of driveâ€up INR testing in a rural pharmacistâ€managed anticoagulation clinic. METHODS: This crossâ€sectional cohort survey study offered each patient attending the anticoagulation clinic via driveâ€up or inâ€office visit a survey between May 27 and July 2, 2020. Patients testing offâ€site were excluded. Study end points included monthly patient volume, visit type preference, testing barriers, desired driveâ€up duration, and overall clinic satisfaction. Clinic appointment volume from October 2019 to June 2020 was collected retrospectively through a schedule review. RESULTS: Sixtyâ€four (80%) of 80 surveys offered were completed: 46.6% of respondents preferred driveâ€up testing, 26.7% indifferent, and 26.7% preferred inâ€office visits; 38.7% of respondents indicated a greater likelihood of continuing routine INR monitoring via driveâ€up testing. Of the respondents completing the survey curbside, 46% and 27% of respondents identified reduced COVIDâ€19 transmission risk and ease of transportation as benefits of driveâ€up INR testing, respectively. March and April clinic volumes were 19% and 22% below average, respectively, returning to baseline after driveâ€up testing was implemented. Clinic rating before and after driveâ€up testing remained high at 2.75 on a scale of 0â€3. While infection risk was identified as the biggest barrier to care by 32.8% of respondents, 59.3% of all respondents wanted driveâ€up testing to continue indefinitely. CONCLUSIONS: Driveâ€up INR testing improves patient attendance during the COVIDâ€19 pandemic. Patient perception of driveâ€up testing is positive. About 46% of respondents preferred driveâ€up INR testing with telehealth followâ€up and 59.3% of respondents want driveâ€up testing to continue indefinitely, which suggests this approach to INR testing as a potential method to allay barriers to routine monitoring beyond the scope of the pandemic.
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- Try single phrases listed below for: 1
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date