Selected article for: "acute respiratory and lus lung ultrasound"

Author: Nouvenne, Antonio; Zani, Marco Davìd; Milanese, Gianluca; Parise, Alberto; Baciarello, Marco; Bignami, Elena Giovanna; Odone, Anna; Sverzellati, Nicola; Meschi, Tiziana; Ticinesi, Andrea
Title: Lung Ultrasound in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Correlations with Chest CT on Hospital admission
  • Cord-id: 4emzxu09
  • Document date: 2020_6_22
  • ID: 4emzxu09
    Snippet: BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an accurate, safe, and cheap tool assisting in the diagnosis of several acute respiratory diseases. The diagnostic value of LUS in the workup of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in the hospital setting is still uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational study was to explore correlations of the LUS appearance of COVID-19-related pneumonia with CT findings. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (14 males, age 64 ± 16 years) urgently hospitalized for COVID-19
    Document: BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) is an accurate, safe, and cheap tool assisting in the diagnosis of several acute respiratory diseases. The diagnostic value of LUS in the workup of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) in the hospital setting is still uncertain. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this observational study was to explore correlations of the LUS appearance of COVID-19-related pneumonia with CT findings. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (14 males, age 64 ± 16 years) urgently hospitalized for COVID-19 pneumonia, who underwent chest CT and bedside LUS on the day of admission, were enrolled in this observational study. CT images were reviewed by expert chest radiologists, who calculated a visual CT score based on extension and distribution of ground-glass opacities and consolidations. LUS was performed by clinicians with certified competency in thoracic ultrasonography, blind to CT findings, following a systematic approach recommended by ultrasound guidelines. LUS score was calculated according to presence, distribution, and severity of abnormalities. RESULTS: All participants had CT findings suggestive of bilateral COVID-19 pneumonia, with an average visual scoring of 43 ± 24%. LUS identified 4 different possible ­abnormalities, with bilateral distribution (average LUS score 15 ± 5): focal areas of nonconfluent B lines, diffuse confluent B lines, small subpleural microconsolidations with pleural line irregularities, and large parenchymal consolidations with air bronchograms. LUS score was significantly correlated with CT visual scoring (r = 0.65, p < 0.001) and oxygen saturation in room air (r = −0.66, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When integrated with clinical data, LUS could represent a valid diagnostic aid in patients with suspect COVID-19 pneumonia, which reflects CT findings.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abnormal finding and acute respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • abnormal finding and admission time: 1
    • abnormality distribution and acute respiratory distress syndrome: 1
    • accurate tool and acute respiratory distress syndrome: 1, 2, 3
    • accurate tool and admission time: 1
    • acute care and adequate personal protective equipment: 1, 2, 3
    • acute care and admission include: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute care and admission oxygen saturation: 1
    • acute care and admission time: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute care hospital and admission include: 1, 2, 3
    • acute care hospital and admission oxygen saturation: 1
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and adequate personal protective equipment: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and admission include: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome and admission oxygen saturation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis and admission include: 1
    • acute respiratory distress syndrome diagnosis and admission oxygen saturation: 1, 2