Selected article for: "brain damage and connected speech"

Author: Brielle C Stark; Alexandra Basilakos; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Title: Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech
  • Document date: 2019_2_8
  • ID: nzv96tjh_51
    Snippet: Common mechanisms were tested using a conjunction analysis (p<0.05) on significant clusters identified by the VLSM (Nichols et al., 2005) , showing clusters of voxels that, when damaged, associated with paraphasias in both the PNT and the CS task groups (Nichols et al., 2005) . Therefore, by examining the supra-threshold voxels shared across task group analyses, we can determine whether damage to a brain region underlies a specific paraphasia typ.....
    Document: Common mechanisms were tested using a conjunction analysis (p<0.05) on significant clusters identified by the VLSM (Nichols et al., 2005) , showing clusters of voxels that, when damaged, associated with paraphasias in both the PNT and the CS task groups (Nichols et al., 2005) . Therefore, by examining the supra-threshold voxels shared across task group analyses, we can determine whether damage to a brain region underlies a specific paraphasia type for just one task (e.g. connected speech) or both tasks (e.g.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • brain region and significant cluster: 1
    • conjunction analysis and CS task group: 1
    • conjunction analysis and paraphasia type: 1, 2
    • conjunction analysis and significant cluster: 1, 2
    • conjunction analysis and task group: 1
    • CS task group and paraphasia type: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • CS task group and significant cluster: 1, 2, 3
    • CS task group and task group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
    • paraphasia type and significant cluster: 1, 2, 3
    • paraphasia type and task group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • significant cluster and task group: 1, 2, 3