Selected article for: "age specific susceptibility and contact rate"

Author: Ayoub, Houssein H; Chemaitelly, Hiam; Mumtaz, Ghina R; Seedat, Shaheen; Awad, Susanne F; Makhoul, Monia; Abu-Raddad, Laith J
Title: Characterizing key attributes of the epidemiology of COVID-19 in China: Model-based estimations
  • Cord-id: 7styuuzo
  • Document date: 2020_4_11
  • ID: 7styuuzo
    Snippet: Background: A novel coronavirus strain, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in China in late 2019. The resulting disease, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-2019), soon became a pandemic. This study aims to characterize key attributes of the epidemiology of this infection in China. Methods: An age-stratified mathematical model was constructed to describe the transmission dynamics and estimate the age-specific differences in the biological susceptibility to the infe
    Document: Background: A novel coronavirus strain, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), emerged in China in late 2019. The resulting disease, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-2019), soon became a pandemic. This study aims to characterize key attributes of the epidemiology of this infection in China. Methods: An age-stratified mathematical model was constructed to describe the transmission dynamics and estimate the age-specific differences in the biological susceptibility to the infection, age-assortativeness in transmission mixing, case fatality rate (CFR), and transition in rate of infectious contacts (and reproduction number R0) following introduction of mass interventions. Results: The model estimated the infectious contact rate in early epidemic at 0.59 contacts per day (95% uncertainty interval (UI)=0.48-0.71). Relative to those 60-69 years of age, susceptibility to the infection was only 0.06 in those ≤19 years, 0.34 in 20-29 years, 0.57 in 30-39 years, 0.69 in 40-49 years, 0.79 in 50-59 years, 0.94 in 70-79 years, and 0.88 in ≥80 years. The assortativeness in transmission mixing by age was very limited at 0.004 (95% UI=0.002-0.008). Final CFR was 5.1% (95% UI=4.8-5.4%). R0 rapidly declined from 2.1 (95% UI=1.8-2.4) to 0.06 (95% UI=0.05-0.07) following onset of interventions. Conclusion: Age appears to be a principal factor in explaining the patterns of COVID-19 transmission dynamics in China. The biological susceptibility to the infection seems limited among children, intermediate among young to mid-age adults, but high among those >50 years of age. There was no evidence for differential contact mixing by age, consistent with most transmission occurring in households rather than in schools or workplaces.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • actual infection and acute respiratory syndrome: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
    • actual infection and additional risk: 1
    • acute respiratory syndrome and additional risk: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown contact: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown measure: 1, 2, 3
    • acute respiratory syndrome and lockdown role: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • acute respiratory syndrome and low susceptibility: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • additional risk and lockdown contact: 1, 2, 3
    • additional risk and lockdown role: 1