Selected article for: "Cmap database and enrichment score"

Author: Yadi Zhou; Yuan Hou; Jiayu Shen; Yin Huang; William Martin; Feixiong Cheng
Title: Network-based Drug Repurposing for Human Coronavirus
  • Document date: 2020_2_5
  • ID: b4mdiont_23
    Snippet: To further validate the 135 repurposable drugs against HCoVs, we first performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using transcriptome data of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV infected host cells (see Methods). These transcriptome data were used as gene signatures for HCoVs. Additionally, we downloaded the expression data of drug-treated human cell lines from the Connectivity Map (CMAP) database [33] to obtain drug-gene signatures. We calculated a GSEA sc.....
    Document: To further validate the 135 repurposable drugs against HCoVs, we first performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) using transcriptome data of MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV infected host cells (see Methods). These transcriptome data were used as gene signatures for HCoVs. Additionally, we downloaded the expression data of drug-treated human cell lines from the Connectivity Map (CMAP) database [33] to obtain drug-gene signatures. We calculated a GSEA score (see Methods) for each drug and used this score as an indication of bioinformatics validation of the 135 drugs. Specifically, an enrichment score (ES) was calculated for each HCoV data set, and ES > 0 and P < 0.05 (permutation test) was used as cut-off for a significant association of gene signatures between a drug and a specific HCoV. The GSEA score, ranging from 0 to 3, is the number of data sets that met these criteria for a specific drug. Mesalazine (an approved drug for inflammatory bowel disease), sirolimus (an approved immunosuppressive drug), and equilin (an approved agonist of the estrogen receptor for menopausal symptoms) achieved the highest GSEA scores of 3, followed by paroxetine and melatonin with GSEA scores of 2. We next selected 16 potential repurposable drugs ( Figure 5A and Table 1 ) against HCoVs using subject matter expertise based on a combination of factors: (i) strength of the network-predicted associations (a smaller network proximity score in Supplementary Table S4 ); (ii) validation by GSEA analyses;

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • data set and drug treat: 1, 2
    • data set and enrichment analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19
    • data set and enrichment score: 1
    • data set and ES enrichment score: 1
    • data set and estrogen receptor: 1, 2
    • data set and factor combination: 1
    • data set and gene signature: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • data set and GSEA analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • data set and GSEA enrichment analysis: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • data set and GSEA enrichment analysis set: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • data set and GSEA enrichment analysis set gene: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
    • data set and host cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • data set and human cell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8
    • data set and human cell line: 1
    • data set and ii validation: 1
    • data set and inflammatory bowel disease: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • data set and Methods score: 1, 2, 3
    • data set and network predict: 1, 2, 3
    • data set and significant association: 1, 2, 3, 4