Author: Brielle C Stark; Alexandra Basilakos; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Title: Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech Document date: 2019_2_8
ID: nzv96tjh_55
Snippet: Recall that for the CS task group, the proportion of paraphasias was calculated as a proportion of total nouns, whereas for the PNT task group, the proportion of paraphasias was calculated as a proportion of total attempts. The distribution of paraphasias for each group is shown in Table 2 ......
Document: Recall that for the CS task group, the proportion of paraphasias was calculated as a proportion of total nouns, whereas for the PNT task group, the proportion of paraphasias was calculated as a proportion of total attempts. The distribution of paraphasias for each group is shown in Table 2 .
Search related documents:
Co phrase search for related documents- CS task group and paraphasia proportion: 1
- CS task group and paraphasias distribution: 1
- CS task group and PNT task group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
- CS task group and task group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
- group paraphasias distribution and paraphasias distribution: 1, 2
- group paraphasias distribution and PNT task group: 1
- group paraphasias distribution and task group: 1
- paraphasia proportion and task group: 1
- paraphasias distribution and PNT task group: 1
- paraphasias distribution and task group: 1, 2
- PNT task group and task group: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13
Co phrase search for related documents, hyperlinks ordered by date