Selected article for: "collect information and demographic information"

Author: Sbrana, Mariana Ferreira; Fornazieri, Marco Aurélio; Bruni-Cardoso, Alexandre; Avelino-Silva, Vivian I.; Schechtman, Deborah; Voegels, Richard Louis; Malnic, Bettina; Glezer, Isaias; de Rezende Pinna, Fabio
Title: Olfactory Dysfunction in Frontline Health Care Professionals During COVID-19 Pandemic in Brazil
  • Cord-id: 9uwr9559
  • Document date: 2021_3_9
  • ID: 9uwr9559
    Snippet: Upper respiratory viral infections can decrease the sense of smell either by inflammatory restriction of nasal airflow that carries the odorant molecules or through interference in olfactory sensory neuron function. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), worldwide reports of severe smell loss (anosmia/hyposmia) revealed a different type of olfactory dysfunction associated with respiratory virus infection
    Document: Upper respiratory viral infections can decrease the sense of smell either by inflammatory restriction of nasal airflow that carries the odorant molecules or through interference in olfactory sensory neuron function. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, triggered by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), worldwide reports of severe smell loss (anosmia/hyposmia) revealed a different type of olfactory dysfunction associated with respiratory virus infection. Since self-reported perception of smell is subjective and SARS-CoV-2 exposure is variable in the general population, we aimed to study a population that would be more homogeneously exposed to the virus. Here, we investigated the prevalence of olfactory loss in frontline health professionals diagnosed with COVID-19 in Brazil, one of the major epicenters of the disease. We also analyzed the rate of olfactory function recovery and the particular characteristics of olfactory deficit in this population. A widely disclosed cross-sectional online survey directed to health care workers was developed by a group of researchers to collect data concerning demographic information, general symptoms, otolaryngological symptoms, comorbidities, and COVID-19 test results. Of the 1,376 health professionals who completed the questionnaire, 795 (57.8%) were working directly with COVID-19 patients, either in intensive care units, emergency rooms, wards, outpatient clinics, or other areas. Five-hundred forty-one (39.3%) participants tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, and 509 (37%) were not tested. Prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in COVID-19-positive subjects was 83.9% (454 of 541) compared to 12.9% (42 of 326) of those who tested negative and to 14.9% (76 of 509) of those not tested. Olfactory dysfunction incidence was higher in those working in wards, emergency rooms, and intensive care units compared to professionals in outpatient clinics. In general, remission from olfactory symptoms was frequent by the time of responses. Taste disturbances were present in 74.1% of infected participants and were significantly associated with hyposmia. In conclusion, olfactory dysfunction is highly correlated with exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in health care professionals, and remission rates up to 2 weeks are high.

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents
    • abovementioned conclusion and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • administrative job and logistic regression: 1, 2
    • administrative job and logistic regression analysis: 1
    • logistic regression analysis and long duration: 1, 2, 3, 4
    • logistic regression analysis and long period: 1, 2
    • logistic regression analysis and loss smell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
    • logistic regression analysis and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11
    • logistic regression analysis assess and low prevalence: 1
    • logistic regression and long duration: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
    • logistic regression and long period: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    • logistic regression and loss smell: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • logistic regression and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
    • long duration and loss smell: 1
    • long duration and low prevalence: 1, 2
    • long period and loss smell: 1
    • long period and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3
    • loss smell and low prevalence: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5