Selected article for: "present study and sensitivity specificity"

Author: Ria Lassaunière; Anders Frische; Zitta B Harboe; Alex CY Nielsen; Anders Fomsgaard; Karen A Krogfelt; Charlotte S Jørgensen
Title: Evaluation of nine commercial SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays
  • Document date: 2020_4_10
  • ID: 8cg5yj20_27
    Snippet: The differences observed for the sensitivity and specificity of the SARS-CoV-2-specific total antibody testing and antibody type ELISAs correspond to previous reports. . This notably lower sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG detection is in agreement to that observed here for the Euroimmun IgG ELISA (65%). In the present study the Wantai IgG and Euroimmun IgG ELISAs could not be compared due to unavailability of the former. The possibility th.....
    Document: The differences observed for the sensitivity and specificity of the SARS-CoV-2-specific total antibody testing and antibody type ELISAs correspond to previous reports. . This notably lower sensitivity for SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG detection is in agreement to that observed here for the Euroimmun IgG ELISA (65%). In the present study the Wantai IgG and Euroimmun IgG ELISAs could not be compared due to unavailability of the former. The possibility that overall lower sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISAs may be a more universal occurrence rather than manufacturer dependent warrants further investigation. In addition to lower sensitivities, the Euroimmun IgA and IgG ELISAs are also more prone to cross-react with negative sera as described in the present study and in a separate analysis of the beta-versions of these assays [10].

    Search related documents:
    Co phrase search for related documents